MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vena Caval Abnormalities Discovered During Dissection in the Anatomy Lab: Two Cadaveric Case Reports

2020· article· en· W3016651465 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas J. Steiner, Jonathan M. Sgro, Alexander P. Dowhayko, Adam J. Raffoul, Anna Farias

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDissection (medical)Inferior vena cavaSurgeryVeinAnatomyPopulationCoronary sinusRadiologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intro Congenital abnormalities of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are rare in the general population with the incidence of IVC duplication being between 0.2 – 3%. Persistent left superior vena cava (SVC) has an incidence of 0.3 – 0.7%. It is important to identify such variations through imaging prior to various thoracic and abdominal surgeries to minimize peri‐operative complications. Methods Two cadavers with vena caval abnormalities were identified in a medical school cadaveric anatomy lab. The donor’s age, sex and cause of death were identified through bequeathal services. The pathway of the aberrant structures was identified through dissection and any tributaries along their courses were isolated. Surrounding structures were examined to identify any other concurrent abnormalities. Results We identified two cadavers with vena caval abnormalities. The first case was a 75‐year old female whose cause of death was a bowel obstruction with comorbid dementia. On this cadaver we identified a persistent left SVC that originated from the brachiocephalic vein on the left side that measured 19 mm in diameter. The aberrant structure drained into the right atrium via the coronary sinus, which was noticeably enlarged. The second case was a 76‐year old female whose cause of death was multiorgan failure with comorbid end stage liver failure, pulmonary edema and hypothyroidism. We identified a duplicated IVC with a diameter of 12 mm originating at the left iliac vein and draining into the left renal vein. Along the duplicated IVC were multiple branches originating from the posterior abdominal cavity. Conclusion We present here two cases with rare vena caval abnormalities found in cadavers in our anatomy lab. The embryological origin of a duplicated IVC stems from the persistence of both left and right supracardinal veins during development. A persistent left SVC occurs when the left superior cardinal vein fails to regress inferior to the brachiocephalic vein. Although rare, recognizing these anatomical variations bears clinical relevance, especially in a surgical setting. These abnormalities are important to identify pre‐operatively to avoid unexpected peri‐operative complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicVascular anomalies and interventionsFrench-language works237,207