MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Serum MMP‐3 and its Association with Large Artery Stiffness

2020· article· en· W3016694591 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nathaniel Iannarelli, Kylie S. Dempster, Aindriu R. R. Maguire, Jessy Moore, Adam J. MacNeil, Terrance J. Wade, Deborah D. O’Leary

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArterial stiffnessElastinPulse wave velocityMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyAortaMatrix metalloproteinaseExtracellular matrixPopulationArteryArterial wallBlood pressurePathologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large artery stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all‐cause mortality. Stiffening of the large arteries (e.g., the aorta) is characterized by a marked reduction in the elastin‐collagen ratio in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the arterial wall, and is largely the result of fatigue and fragmentation of ECM components due to cyclic stress. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of zinc‐dependent endopeptidases, may be important in the progression of arterial stiffness due to their involvement in ECM homeostasis and arterial wall remodeling. MMP‐3 may be of particular importance in arterial wall remodeling due to its ability to degrade numerous constituents of the arterial ECM, such as elastin and collagen. Previous studies have examined the effects of MMP‐3 genotype and expression on arterial wall stiffness in different disease populations; however, none have examined the association between MMP‐3 expression and large artery stiffness in a population of healthy young adults. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the association between serum MMP‐3 and carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), a non‐invasive measure of large artery stiffness, in a sample of healthy young adults. It is expected that individuals with higher serum MMP‐3 levels will present with larger cfPWVs. 156 participants ( n = 68 males) aged 20–25 years were recruited as part of the Niagara Longitudinal Heart Study (NLHS), and all participants were free of any clinically diagnosed CVD. cfPWV (m/s) was determined using applanation tonometry as a non‐invasive surrogate of large artery stiffness. Serum MMP‐3 concentrations (pg/mL) were measured using standard ELISA techniques. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the cross‐sectional association between serum MMP‐3 and cfPWV. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, mean arterial pressure (MAP), body mass index (BMI), and smoking status. Data on cfPWV and MMP‐3 were available on 139 participants ( n = 63 males), and were subsequently used in analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, MAP, BMI, and smoking status, serum MMP‐3 was significantly and positively associated with cfPWV ( p = 0.038). cfPWV was also significantly and positively associated with MAP and smoking status (both p < 0.001), but not age ( p = 0.336). The association between cfPWV and both sex and BMI showed a positive trend, but only reached borderline significance ( p = 0.059 and p = 0.054, respectively). Together, MAP, smoking status and serum MMP‐3 predicted 22% of the variation in cfPWV (adjusted R 2 = 0.220, p < 0.001). These data suggest that greater serum MMP‐3 levels are associated with larger cfPWVs and thus, greater large artery stiffness. Physiologic MMP‐3 levels function to maintain ECM homeostasis; however, greater MMP‐3 levels may exacerbate ECM degradation and contribute to stiffening of the large arteries. Future research should examine the potential functional role of MMP‐3 in CVD progression. Support or Funding Information The NLHS is funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR #363774 and #399332). KSD is funded by CIHR Doctoral Research Award—Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate scholarship (RFN #167014). ARRM is supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship program

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→