An Absolute Paleogeographic Positioning of the Early Permian Tarim Large Igneous Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a quantitative characterization of the early Permian latitude and longitude of the Tarim block and its relationship to the supercontinent Pangea using a combination of newly acquired paleomagnetic data and inferences drawn from the plume generation zone reconstruction method. Early Permian magmatic rocks from Tarim have previously been interpreted as constituents of a large igneous province (LIP) and were therefore possibly derived from a mantle plume originating at the core‐mantle boundary. Here, we present the results of a paleomagnetic investigation of early Permian rocks (~288 Ma) in the Keping area of northwestern Tarim. A stable high‐temperature component (HTC) was isolated from 413 samples from 51 sites. The directions of this HTC pass the fold test and are of exclusively reversed polarity, which is consistent with their acquisition during the late Carboniferous to mid‐Permian Kiaman Reverse Polarity Superchron, suggesting that the HTC is likely primary. From these results, we compute a new early Permian pole for Tarim: 50.1°N, 170.5°E, A 95 = 3.6°. Taking the estimated eruption center of the Tarim LIP (41°N, 80°E) as a reference point, this pole restores the LIP to a paleolatitude of ~30° at 288 Ma. Given this paleolatitude estimate, we attempt to fit the LIP to the edge of one of the large low shear velocity provinces in the lowermost mantle. It is not feasible to reconstruct the Tarim LIP directly above the margins of either the African or Pacific large low shear velocity provinces, but its reconstructed position could potentially be associated with the “Perm” anomaly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".