Dietary Creatine Supplementation Does Not Alter Trabecular Bone Morphology in Male and Female Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Supplementation with dietary creatine has been reported to improve markers of bone structure in animals and humans. Trabecular bone is one of two types of bone responsible for strength and structural support in the body. It serves to support areas that experience mechanical stress. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of varying doses of dietary creatine on the trabecular bone morphology of male and female rats. Methods 32 Sprague‐Dawley rats (16 male, 16 female) were randomized into one of four groups: 0g/L, 2.5g/L, 5g/L, or 10g/L of creatine monohydrate (CM) in drinking water with 1% sucrose (for palatability). Dietary interventions began at 12 weeks and lasted for 8 weeks. Ex vivo scanning and analysis was conducted on the proximal region of left femurs using micro‐computed tomography (mCT). Standard measures of trabecular bone morphology were measured at the proximal femur: trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular number (Tb.N), percent bone volume (BV/TV), connectivity (Conn) and connectivity density (Conn.Dn). Results There were no significant differences in Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, Tb.N, BV/TV, Conn, or Conn.Dn between creatine dose groups for males or females. Males had greater Tb.Th than females (p<0.01). Greater Tb.Sp was also observed in males as compared to females (p<0.01). Females demonstrated significantly higher BV/TV (p<0.01) as well as a greater Tb.N (p<0.01) than males. Conn was significantly different between sexes (p<0.05) with a higher value in females compared to males. Conn.Dn was also significantly higher in females (p<0.01) compared to males. Conclusions Eight weeks of different dietary intakes of creatine does not appear to have an effect on proximal femur Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, Tb.N, BV/TV, Conn, or Conn.Dn. However, differences in sex were observed for each dependent variable which is suggestive of a difference in the trabecular structure between males and females. Support or Funding Information Supported by NSERC (Canada).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".