MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016839270 · doi:10.1177/1040638720915869

Development of a mismatch amplification mutation assay to correctly serotype isolates of <i>Streptococcus suis</i> serotypes 1, 2, 1/2, and 14

2020· article· en· W3016839270 on OpenAlexafffund
Sonia Lacouture, Masatoshi Okura, Daisuke Takamatsu, Lorelei Corsaut, Marcelo Gottschalk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCentre for Research on Intermediality, University of MontrealNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSerotypeBiologyStreptococcus suisVirologyMicrobiologyVirulencePolymerase chain reactionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streptococcus suis is one of the most important bacterial swine pathogens worldwide and is an emerging pathogen in humans. There are 29 serotypes, and serotyping, which is based on the antigenicity of the capsular polysaccharide (CPS) or on its coding genes, is often part of routine identification and provides further information regarding S. suis virulence and zoonotic potential. Serotypes 2 and 14 possess high zoonotic potential, and serotype 1/2 is the serotype most frequently isolated from diseased pigs in North America. PCR has replaced antibody-based techniques to perform serotyping. However, traditional PCR is not able to differentiate serotype 2 from 1/2 and serotype 1 from 14, given that the only difference in the cps loci of those serotype pairs is a nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphism. We developed a mismatch amplification mutation assay (MAMA)-PCR that was able to correctly serotype 148 isolates previously known to be serotypes 1, 2, 1/2, or 14. This technique will be highly useful in animal and human health laboratories performing PCR serotyping of S. suis isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Veterinary Diagnostic InvestigationSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207