MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016858550 · doi:10.1039/d0ay00550a

Colorimetric indicators for volatile amines based on succinic anhydride (SAh)-grafted poly (lactic acid) (PLA)

2020· article· en· W3016858550 on OpenAlexafffund
Adrián Lopera-Valle, Anastasia Elias

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Methods · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSuccinic anhydrideLactic acidSuccinic acidChemistryAcid anhydrideChromatographyOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart materials that can undergo changes in color upon the detection of amines have the potential to provide information on the freshness of fish and meat. To engineer a material that undergoes a change in color upon exposure to biogenic amines, succinic anhydride functional groups - which are deprotonated in the presence of amines - are grafted onto a biopolymer poly(lactic acid) backbone. This material is then blended with a pH sensitive dye, yielding a material that shows a highly specific response to amines. In this system, the reaction between SAh and amines protonates the dye and leads to an irreversible change in color in the indicators. The resulting change in color was recorded and monitored with standardized photos and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Initially, indicators of different degrees of SAh (from 5 wt% to 45 wt%) grafted onto PLA were exposed to the vapours from a 400 ppm amine solution. The samples with higher degrees of grafting underwent the most visible changes in color. A more detailed study of the effect of temperature and amine concentration was performed on indicators with 30 wt% SAh. The limits of detection, half-time and kinetics of the response are also presented. Higher temperatures and concentrations were found to increase the degree of the color change while decreasing the half-time of the response of the indicators. This work shows potential opportunities for the development of simple real-time amine indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical MethodsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207