MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contrasting Reflex Neural Modulation of Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity at Rest and During One‐leg Dynamic Exercise in Subjects with and without Heart Failure

2020· article· en· W3016880347 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine F. Notarius, Daniel A. Keir, Mark B. Badrov, Philip J. Millar, Paul Oh, John S. Floras

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity of GuelphUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroneurographyMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureSupine positionHeart rateBaroreceptorBaroreflexEjection fractionBlood pressureReflex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We previously showed that muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is augmented at rest in patients with heart failure due to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and rises further during mild and moderate dynamic 1‐leg exercise in stark contrast to the drop observed in healthy controls at similar exercise intensities. The reflex mechanisms responsible for this unique response are unknown. We hypothesized that MSNA may be reduced at rest and during exercise in HFrEF by either: 1) stimulating the sympatho‐inhibitory cardiopulmonary baroreceptors by exercising supine rather than upright; or 2) inhibiting the sympatho‐excitatory peripheral chemoreceptors by breathing 32% oxygen (O 2 ). We studied 6 stable, non‐diabetic, medicated HFrEF men ( mean age 58 ± 3 SE [range 46 to 65] years; mean left ventricular ejection fraction 29 ± 4% [range 15–38]); of either ischemic (n=5) or non‐ischemic (n=1) etiology; plus 6 healthy, age matched, medication‐free volunteers (3 women; mean age 58 ± 3 [range 49 to 72]). We assessed peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak ) by open‐circuit spirometry. On a separate day, fibular MSNA (microneurography) was measured at rest and during upright 1‐leg cycling (2 min each unloaded and at 50% of VO 2peak ). The identical cycling protocol was then repeated during supine exercise (n=5 HFrEF) and again during upright cycling while breathing 32% O 2 (n=4 HFrEF). Heart rate and diastolic blood pressure were similar across interventions in both groups but systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in HFrEF vs controls (main effect P=0.01). MSNA was reduced at rest only while supine in control subjects (main effect P=0.01; P=0.01 vs upright). Whereas in HFrEF, both supine posture and supplemental O 2 attenuated MSNA burst frequency at rest (main effect P=0.01; P=0.02 vs upright). During exercise, MSNA burst frequency progressively decreased in healthy controls particularly during unloaded cycling (main effect of time P<0.001), and tended to be lower throughout supine cycling (P=0.06 vs upright). By contrast, in HFrEF patients, there was no significant change in MSNA burst frequency during exercise while supine nor with supplemental oxygen (main effect of intervention P=0.51; time P=0.34). Thus, both at rest and during mild cycling exercise, supine posture augments the sympathoinhibitory response in control subjects. However in HFrEF patients, sympathoexcitation at rest can be reduced to a similar extent by either triggering the inhibitory cardiopulmonary baroreflex or abolishing arterial chemoreceptor activation with no further effect during exercise. Support or Funding Information Supported by Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario and Canadian Institutes for Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207