Dibutyl Phthalate Augments Allergen-induced Lung Function Decline and Alters Human Airway Immunology. A Randomized Crossover Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Phthalates are a group of chemicals used in common commercial products. Epidemiological studies suggest that phthalate exposure is associated with development or worsening of allergic diseases such as asthma. However, effects of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) or other phthalates found in high concentrations in indoor air have never been examined in allergic individuals in a controlled exposure setting. Objectives To investigate the airway effects in humans caused by inhalation of a known concentration of a single phthalate, DBP. Methods In a randomized crossover study, 16 allergen-sensitized participants were exposed to control air or DBP for 3 hours in an environmental chamber followed immediately by an allergen inhalation challenge. Bronchoalveolar wash and lavage were obtained 24 hours after exposure. Lung function, early allergic response, airway responsiveness, inflammation, immune mediators, and immune cell phenotypes were assessed after DBP exposure. Measurements and Main Results: DBP exposure increased the early allergic response (21.4% decline in FEV1 area under the curve, P = 0.03). Airway responsiveness was increased by 48.1% after DBP exposure in participants without baseline hyperresponsiveness (P = 0.01). DBP increased the recruitment of BAL total macrophages by 4.6% (P = 0.07), whereas the M2 macrophage phenotype increased by 46.9% (P = 0.04). Airway immune mediator levels were modestly affected by DBP. Conclusions DBP exposure augmented allergen-induced lung function decline, particularly in those without baseline hyperresponsiveness, and exhibited immunomodulatory effects in the airways of allergic individuals. This is the first controlled human exposure study providing biological evidence for phthalate-induced effects in the airways. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02688478).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".