MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Low Birth Weight Pigs Exhibit Altered Cerebral Hemodynamics and Vasomotor Control

2020· article· en· W3016899179 on OpenAlexaff
Zeyad El Karsh, Jude S. Morton, Maria T. Jarque, Breanna Patton, Lucas Alves Rodrigues, Kate Illing, Al Chicoine, Jade Sands, Austin G. Wellette‐Hunsucker, David P. Ferguson, Daniel A Columbus, Lynn P. Weber, T. Dylan Olver

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasomotorMedicineInternal medicineHemodynamicsCerebral arteriesEndocrinologyCerebral blood flowMiddle cerebral arteryTranscranial DopplerLow birth weightOffspringBiologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low birth weight (LBW) offspring have a higher prevalence of long‐term cognitive impairments, possibly the result of altered blood flow control in the brain. Using a pig model, we tested the hypothesis that LBW progeny exhibit abnormal cerebral hemodynamics and vasomotor control during early developmental stages of growth. At birth, littermate pigs were identified as normal (NBW=1.7±0.1 kg) or low birth weight (LBW=1.2±0.2 kg). Measurements were obtained at 28 d (weaning) and 56 d of age (n=8/group, 4M/4F per group) : i) 28‐d old NBW (28‐NBW; body mass=10.0±0.4 kg); ii) 28‐d old LBW (28‐LBW; body mass=8.0±0.4 kg); iii) 56‐d old NBW (56‐NBW; body mass=23.0±1.0 kg); and iv) 56‐d old LBW (56‐LBW; body mass=17.0±0.8 kg). Cerebral blood flow velocity was measured using Transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Thereafter, pigs were euthanatized, their brains were harvested, weighed and their pial arteries were dissected for pressure myography experiments. Briefly, pial artery vasomotor control was studied in response to a Ca 2+ ‐activated potassium (BK) channel α‐subunit agonist NS1619 (elicits vasodilation; 1e‐10‐1e‐4 M) and sympathetic co‐transmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY; potent vasoconstrictor; 1e‐10‐1e‐4 M). Brain mass and body mass were significantly lower in LBW vs. NBW pigs ( p <0.01). Mean cerebral blood flow velocities were similar between LBW and NBW pigs ( p≥ 0.20). Peak systolic velocities were greater (main effect of BW, p <0.01) and reductions in end diastolic velocities approached significance in LBW vs. NBW pigs (main effect of BW, p =0.08). Accordingly, the resistive index was greater in LBW vs. NBW pigs (main effect of BW, p <0.01). The maximum vasodilator response to NS1619 was not significantly different between LBW and NBW pigs (p=0.12). However, the overall magnitude of dilation (area under the curve) was lower in LBW vs. NBW pigs (main effect of BW, p <0.05). The maximum vasoconstrictor response to NPY was greater in LBW vs. NBW groups (main effect of BW, p <0.05). Similarly, the overall magnitude of constriction was greater in LBW vs. NBW pigs (main effect of BW, p <0.01). With respect to cerebral hemodynamics and vasomotor control, no main effects of age were observed ( p≥ 0.50). Results from this study show that LBW pigs display alterations in cerebral hemodynamics as well as cerebral vasomotor control that persist for at least 56 days. Impaired BK channel function and enhanced vasoreactivity to sympathetic co‐transmitter NPY may underlie altered cerebrovascular hemodynamics in LBW pigs. Support or Funding Information SHRF Establishment grant (#4522) and NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→