MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Do Second Messengers of Neuroendocrine Factors Alter Aquaporin Expression in Malpighian tubules of the Mosquito, <i>Aedes aegypti</i> ?

2020· article· en· W3016925998 on OpenAlexaff
Britney Picinic, Jean‐Paul Paluzzi, Andrew Donini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalpighian tubule systemAedes aegyptiHindgutBiologyAquaporinOsmoregulationMidgutAedesHemolymphCell biologyZoologySecretionLarvaEndocrinologyEcologySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mosquito Aedes aegypti is considered one of the most dangerous disease vectors because it can transmit several arboviral diseases including Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika virus, and yellow fever. The larvae are aquatic typically inhabiting hypotonic freshwater whereas the adults are terrestrial. Hence, the larvae are usually faced with the osmoregulatory challenge of eliminating excess water from body fluids while adults usually conserve water, that is, with the exception of females when they take a blood meal, at which time they too need to eliminate excess water. Osmoregulation is accomplished, in part by regulating water flux across epithelia of organs such as the midgut, Malpighian tubules (MTs), hindgut and, in the case of larvae, the anal papillae. The MTs with the hindgut are functionally analogous to the renal tubes of mammalian kidneys where urine is produced; however, the mechanisms of urine production are different. In MTs, urine production is accomplished by ion secretion driven by an apical V‐type H + ‐ATPase and water is obliged to follow by osmosis. There is a plethora of literature which describes the regulation of MTs fluid secretion in insects but these studies mostly describe effects on ion transport. Little is known about the regulation of water transport across the epithelium of the MTs. The mosquito, A. aegypti , possesses six aquaporin (water transporter) genes designated AaAQP1 through 6, which are expressed in the MTs and transcript abundance is affected by blood feeding in adult females. Furthermore, AaAQP5 mediates water flux across larval MTs whereas AaAQP1 is expressed in tracheolar cells of adult MTs. In this study we have begun to examine if and how known second messengers of neuroendocrine factors influence AaAQP protein expression in the MTs of A. aegypti with western blots. Thus far we have found that in MTs of larvae incubated with cAMP, AaAQP1 protein expression is higher than unstimulated controls but AaAQP4 levels are unaffected while both AaAQP1 and AaAQP5 expression is not affected by cGMP also in comparison to unstimulated controls. In larvae and adult mosquitoes, cAMP is a second messenger of diuretic hormones that stimulate urine production whereas cGMP is the second messenger of anti‐diuretic hormones, including CAPA peptides, which inhibit fluid secretion at physiological doses. In heterologous expression systems, AaAQP1 and AaAQP5 transport water whereas AaAQP4 is an entomoglyceroporin which transports solutes like trehalose preferentially over water. We conclude that stimulatory hormones of MTs facilitate fluid secretion at least in part by increasing the basal expression of AaAQP1 and that inhibitory hormones may not affect basal AaAQP expression; however, effects of these factors on stimulated MTs and on the expression of the other AaAQP genes is the subject of continuing work. Support or Funding Information NSERC‐Discovery RGPIN‐2018‐05841

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→