Do Second Messengers of Neuroendocrine Factors Alter Aquaporin Expression in Malpighian tubules of the Mosquito, <i>Aedes aegypti</i> ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mosquito Aedes aegypti is considered one of the most dangerous disease vectors because it can transmit several arboviral diseases including Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika virus, and yellow fever. The larvae are aquatic typically inhabiting hypotonic freshwater whereas the adults are terrestrial. Hence, the larvae are usually faced with the osmoregulatory challenge of eliminating excess water from body fluids while adults usually conserve water, that is, with the exception of females when they take a blood meal, at which time they too need to eliminate excess water. Osmoregulation is accomplished, in part by regulating water flux across epithelia of organs such as the midgut, Malpighian tubules (MTs), hindgut and, in the case of larvae, the anal papillae. The MTs with the hindgut are functionally analogous to the renal tubes of mammalian kidneys where urine is produced; however, the mechanisms of urine production are different. In MTs, urine production is accomplished by ion secretion driven by an apical V‐type H + ‐ATPase and water is obliged to follow by osmosis. There is a plethora of literature which describes the regulation of MTs fluid secretion in insects but these studies mostly describe effects on ion transport. Little is known about the regulation of water transport across the epithelium of the MTs. The mosquito, A. aegypti , possesses six aquaporin (water transporter) genes designated AaAQP1 through 6, which are expressed in the MTs and transcript abundance is affected by blood feeding in adult females. Furthermore, AaAQP5 mediates water flux across larval MTs whereas AaAQP1 is expressed in tracheolar cells of adult MTs. In this study we have begun to examine if and how known second messengers of neuroendocrine factors influence AaAQP protein expression in the MTs of A. aegypti with western blots. Thus far we have found that in MTs of larvae incubated with cAMP, AaAQP1 protein expression is higher than unstimulated controls but AaAQP4 levels are unaffected while both AaAQP1 and AaAQP5 expression is not affected by cGMP also in comparison to unstimulated controls. In larvae and adult mosquitoes, cAMP is a second messenger of diuretic hormones that stimulate urine production whereas cGMP is the second messenger of anti‐diuretic hormones, including CAPA peptides, which inhibit fluid secretion at physiological doses. In heterologous expression systems, AaAQP1 and AaAQP5 transport water whereas AaAQP4 is an entomoglyceroporin which transports solutes like trehalose preferentially over water. We conclude that stimulatory hormones of MTs facilitate fluid secretion at least in part by increasing the basal expression of AaAQP1 and that inhibitory hormones may not affect basal AaAQP expression; however, effects of these factors on stimulated MTs and on the expression of the other AaAQP genes is the subject of continuing work. Support or Funding Information NSERC‐Discovery RGPIN‐2018‐05841
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".