MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First report of bacterial spot caused by <i>Xanthomonas cucurbitae</i> on pumpkin in Italy

2020· article· en· W3016946067 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
İrem Altın, L. Casoli, Emilio Stefani

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpotsCucurbita moschataBiologyCucurbita maximaHorticultureInoculationBlack spotLeaf spotBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2018, a disease outbreak was observed on pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata cv. Violina) in the municipality of Reggio Emilia (Northern Italy). Symptoms were observed on leaves and fruits. On leaves, chlorotic spots appeared in July, after a period of rainstorms, later turning necrotic and coalescing (Fig. 1). On fruits, small, brown spots developed (Fig. 2); some necrotic spots became infected by saprophytes and developed rots (Fig. 3). In the affected field, around 90% of fruits were diseased, leading to a total loss of production. In summer 2019, the disease was again observed in the same and neighbouring municipalities affecting two pumpkin varieties (C. moschata cv. Violina and C. maxima cv. Mantovana), displaying the same symptoms as in the previous year (Fig. 4). Symptoms were also observed on watermelon; small necrotic spots developed on leaves, only rarely confluent in large necrotic areas (Fig. 5) whereas, on fruits, no symptom was noted. Isolation from symptomatic tissue was attempted on glucose yeast chalk agar medium. Bright yellow and mucoid colonies, with entire margins, developed after 48-60 hours at 28°C. Individual colonies were further purified for identification. Pathogenicity of isolates was confirmed on young pumpkin plants (C. moschata and C. maxima, 4 to 6 true leaves) by spraying a bacterial suspension (107 cfu/ml) on the canopy; inoculated plants were then kept in a glasshouse and observed for symptom development for up to three weeks. Re-isolated bacteria were identical to the original strains as determined by rep-PCR, thereby fulfilling Koch's postulates. Simplex-PCR with Xanthomonas cucurbitae genus-specific primers (RST2/RST3) produced a 1.4 kb amplicon, similar to X. cucurbitae, type strain CFBP 2542. Isolate identity was confirmed by sequencing of the gyrB, rpoD, fyuA and dnaK housekeeping genes (GenBank Accession Nos.: gyrB: MT110622, rpoD: MT215599, fyuA: MT110623 dnaK, MT227561). BLAST comparison of representative isolates in GenBank showed 99.76-100% identity with X. cucurbitae strains (ICMP 2299, ICMP 2179, ICMP 4767). Therefore, the pathogenic xanthomonads isolated in the province of Reggio Emilia were identified as Xanthomonas cucurbitae. Prior to 1980, a few unconfirmed records of the pathogen were reported in the former Soviet Union (Kiryukhina, 4). More recently, bacterial spot of pumpkins was reported in India, China and Nepal (Lamichhane et al., 5). Bacterial spot of pumpkin is also present in other countries, such as the USA, where it may cause up to 90% crop loss in infected fields (Babadoost & Ravanlou, 1) and in Canada (Trueman et al., 6). Recently, the cause of leaf spot of pumpkin affecting fields in Styria (Austria) was attributed to a set of phytopathogenic bacteria, including X. cucurbitae (Huss, 3), although no official identification was completed. This is the first confirmed report of bacterial spot of pumpkin, followed by isolation, identification and characterisation of its causal agent, Xanthomonas cucurbitae, in Italy and Europe. The geographical origin of the pathogen is unknown, but its introduction might be connected with the international trade of pumpkin seed. Our observation of X. cucurbitae leaf spot on watermelon supports the report of Dutta et al. (2). Further research is needed to assess the host range of the Italian isolates of X. cucurbitae amongst cucurbits. Research conducted in the framework of the EU-COST Action CA16107 “EuroXanth: Integrating Science on Xanthomonadaceae”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207