MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Differential Lung Responses to Early Life Ozone Exposure in Male and Female Rat Offspring

2020· article· en· W3016947196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janice A. Dye, Erica Stewart, Mette C. Schladweiler, Lisa B. Copeland, Urmila P. Kodavanti, Colette N. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringTidal volumeMedicineBronchoconstrictionGestational agePlethysmographVentilation (architecture)Lung volumesAnimal scienceLungInternal medicinePhysiologyPregnancyEndocrinologyRespiratory systemBiologyAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role that early life events (intrauterine growth restriction) and environmental exposures (air pollution) play in development of childhood asthma are only partly understood. We previously showed that exposure of Long‐Evans rats to the oxidant air pollutant ozone (O 3 ) on gestational days (GD) 5 and 6; 0.8 ppm x 4h] resulted in growth restriction at GD21. The aim of this study was to determine whether gestational ± repeated peri‐adolescent O 3 ‐exposure of offspring (0.4–0.8 ppm x 4h; once/week at 5, 6, and 7 weeks‐of‐age) would alter lung growth or acute ventilatory response to O 3 exposure. Immediately post‐exposure (0h), baseline (BL) spontaneous ventilation [i.e., breathing frequency ( f ), tidal volume (TV), and PenH, a unitless parameter suggestive of bronchoconstriction] were obtained using whole body plethysmography (WBP) with EMKA iox 2 software (SCIREQ, Montreal, CANADA) followed by a 6‐min 6%‐CO 2 challenge to enhance tidal breathing. At 4h, the left lung lobe was fixed (at 20 cm H2O) for volume displacement and histology. Right lobes were lavaged to assessed lung injury and inflammation. Two‐way ANOVAs were used to assess male (M) and female (F) responses separately; O 3 ‐exposed groups were compared to Air‐exposed dams + postnatal (PN)‐Airx3)]. By week 7, in males, dam O 3 ‐exposure resulted in augmented body “height” (skull base‐to‐tail head); but not body weight or weight adjusted by height (gm/cm). In females, PN‐O 3 x3 exposure was associated with reduced weight/height. By the 3 rd PN exposure, both M & F O 3 ‐exposed rats continued to exhibit some degree of dyspnea at 0h, with corresponding increases in BL Penh (F: 5.2–5.6 fold, M: 3.9–4.8 fold). Significant reduction in BL TV corr (corrected for “height”) was apparent only in F O 3 +O 3 x3 rats. CO 2 challenge increased breathing frequency in all rats, and F rats were more responsive in terms of enhanced TV increases (A+Ax3 and O 3 +Ax3 offspring increased 56 and 68%, respectively). M A+Ax3 and O 3 +Ax3‐exposed rats increased 45%. By contrast, O 3 ‐exposed F A+O 3 x3 and O 3 +O 3 x3 rats only had 25 and 40% increases, respectively; while M A+O 3 x3 and O 3 +O 3 x3 rats increased 24%. Based on enhanced TV corr , values, both M and F O 3 ‐exposed offspring developed a “classic” short‐and‐shallow respiratory pattern acutely following exposure. In F but not M offspring, CO 2 ‐enhanced TV was inversely correlated with PenH. WBP parameters returned to BL within 2–4 minutes of CO 2 discontinuation. At necropsy, dam O 3 ‐exposure was associated with lower lung (fixed) volumes in females. For both sexes, lung injury (increased protein leakage) and inflammation (neutrophils and cytokines in lavage fluid) were increased chiefly by PN‐O 3 exposure. Protein leakage increased proportionately with PenH. Histopathologic changes are currently being analyzed. In summary, female offspring, especially O 3 +O 3 x3 rats appear to have differences in lung function growth and acute O 3 responses. The 6‐min 6%‐CO 2 protocol was well tolerated and increased TV to approximately 50% of a maximal breath (FEV 1 ). This approach may provide a sensitive, yet non‐invasive method to document differential lung growth trajectories in rodent models of early life stressors. (Abstract does not reflect USEPA policy). Support or Funding Information EPA funding; A‐E and SHC programs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→