MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Evidence for a novel interaction between key enzymes in the lipid biosynthesis pathway in <i>S. cerevisiae</i>

2020· article· en· W3017091245 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brianna Greenwood, David A. Stuart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiochemistryBiosynthesisEnzymeYeastBiologyLysophosphatidic acidChemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipids are essential for energy storage and integrity of membranes in organisms ranging from humans to yeast. The biological properties of triglycerides and other lipids are determined by their composition and the order of assembly. Previous research has demonstrated that acyl‐CoA molecules are delivered to the enzymes involved in lipid biosynthesis in a specific order. It has been proposed that this ordered assembly is achieved by means of a membrane‐bound lipid synthesis complex in which the key enzymes interact through specific protein‐protein contacts. Preliminary data from yeast two‐hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation studies have revealed specific protein‐protein interactions between lipid synthesizing enzymes. Interactions were found between Ole1, the main desaturase in yeast, and Dga1, the terminal enzyme in the triglyceride synthesis pathway, as well as between Ole1 and Slc1, a protein that acylates lysophosphatidic acid. Future research aims to determine the other proteins in complex with Ole1 with a biotin ligase proximity assay and direct interactors via in vitro studies. This research is revealing the architecture of the enzyme complex and how it controls lipid synthesis and composition. Investigating the lipid biosynthesis complex will have implications for a wide variety of applied research, from treating lipid dysregulation in humans to biofuel production by microbes. Support or Funding Information NSERC, BioIndustrial Innovates Canada, Alberta Innovates Biofutures, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→