MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Adiponectin rescues the newborn rat lung from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced inflammation and injury

2020· article· en· W3017102336 on OpenAlexaff
Nikola Despotovic, Nikola Ivanovski, Julijana Ivanovska, Jaques Belik, Estelle B. Gauda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdiponectinSalineInflammationH&E stainLungHistopathologyAdipokineLipopolysaccharideWestern blotInternal medicinePathologyEndocrinologyAndrologyImmunohistochemistryBiologyLeptinObesityGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Preterm infants born during the canalicular and saccular stages of lung development are at high risk for lung injury from oxidative stress and inflammation. Low adipose tissue mass is associated with low serum levels of protective anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative adipokines, such as adiponectin (APN). The modulatory role of APN on inflammatory cytokines and tissue remodeling has unveiled APN as a novel therapeutic target for developmental lung pathologies. We have previously shown that prophylactic administration of exogenous APN protects the newborn rat from LPS‐induced lung injury. In this study, we investigate the ability for systemic APN given 20 hours after LPS aspiration to reverse lung injury in newborn rats. Methods Sprague‐Dawley rats at postnatal day (PND) 4 were treated with 5 mg/kg intrapharyngeal (IPh) LPS or saline; 20 hours later, 2 mg/kg recombinant APN (rAPN) or equal volume saline was administered intraperitoneally (IP). The three treatment groups included: rats exposed to LPS (IPh)/rAPN (IP), LPS (IPh)/saline (IP) and saline (IPh)/saline (IP). Lungs were harvested 6 hours after administration of rAPN and processed for gene (qPCR) and protein (SDS‐PAGE Western blot) expression. In another cohort of PND4 rats, rAPN was administered at 20 and 44 hours, with lungs removed and assayed for histopathology with haemotoxylin and eosin staining 72 hours after LPS. n=4 in each treatment group for gene/protein expression and histopathology. Results Differences were observed in gene and protein expression between treatment groups (ANOVA, p<0.05). In animals treated with IP rAPN 20 hours after IPh LPS, mRNA expression of macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α ( MIP‐1 α ), monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 ( MCP‐1 ) , IL‐1 β , IL‐6, and IL‐10 was reduced 7‐, 8‐, 3.6‐, 1.6‐ and 13‐fold, respectively, relative to saline treatment. Protein expression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), IL‐1β and IL‐10 was also relatively reduced in rAPN treated rats. No change was detected in the mRNA expression of TNF‐ α , or in the protein expression of IL‐6. Lungs treated with rAPN had a marked reduction in histopathological changes relative to saline‐treated controls. Conclusions Our novel in vivo study demonstrates that beyond the preventative role of systemic APN in neonatal lung injury, APN can also attenuate previously induced acute, inflammatory lung injury. We speculate that increasing serum APN levels in preterm infants might protect from acute and chronic inflammatory lung injury. Support or Funding Information Women’s Auxiliary Board at SickKids

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→