MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cytochrome P450‐Derived Epoxy Lipids of N‐3 PUFAs Protect the Heart From Ischemia‐Reperfusion Injury by Regulating Mitochondrial Sirtuin 3

2020· article· en· W3017146886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed M. Darwesh, Tariq Altamimi, K. Lockhart Jamieson, Wesam Bassiouni, Hao Zhang, Gavin Y. Oudit, Gary D. Lopaschuk, John M. Seubert

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIRT3SirtuinMitochondrionReperfusion injuryEpoxygenaseCardioprotectionIschemiaDocosahexaenoic acidPharmacologyInternal medicineBiologyChemistryEndocrinologyBiochemistryMedicinePolyunsaturated fatty acidMetabolismCytochrome P450Fatty acidNAD+ kinaseEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Cytochrome P450 epoxygenases can metabolize dietary n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n‐3 PUFAs) to epoxy lipids, which have known cardioprotective effects; however, it remains unclear how this cardioprotection occurs. Our recent data demonstrate that cytochrome P450 epoxygenase‐derived metabolites of the n‐3 PUFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), 19,20‐epoxydocosapentaenoic acid (19,20‐EDP), exhibit protective effects toward cardiac mitochondria. Maintaining mitochondrial quality is essential to limit myocardial damage following ischemia‐reperfusion (IR) injury. The mitochondrial deacetylase sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of mitochondrial function and cardiac energy metabolism. We hypothesize that the cardioprotective mechanism(s) of 19,20‐EDP against IR injury involve(s) stimulating mitochondrial SIRT3. Methods Langendorff and isolated working heart perfusions were performed in male and female C57BL/6 mice to assess changes in cardiac function and energy metabolism in response to IR injury. Hearts were perfused with either vehicle, 19,20‐EDP (1 μM) and/or the SIRT3 inhibitor nicotinamide (30 μM) for a 20 min baseline perfusion, following which hearts were subjected to 30 min of global no flow ischemia and 40 min of reperfusion. Glucose and palmitate oxidation rates were measured to detect alterations in cardiac energy metabolism. Mitochondrial fractions were assessed for changes in SIRT3 activity and total lysine acetylation levels. Mitochondrial SIRT3 downstream targets were assessed in human ventricular tissues obtained from individuals with ischemic heart disease (IHD) included in the Human Explanted Heart Program and compared to non‐failing control hearts (NFC) collected from unused transplant donors through the Human Organ Procurement and Exchange Program at the University of Alberta. In addition, mitochondrial respiration was assessed in cardiac fibers isolated from the human tissues. Results Hearts perfused with 19,20‐EDP demonstrated improved post‐ischemic functional recovery, glucose oxidation and cardiac efficiency compared to control groups. The cardioprotective effects were associated with enhanced mitochondrial SIRT3 activity and reduced global protein acetylation. We observed increased acetylation of the mitochondrial antioxidant superoxide dismutase 2 in tissues obtained from IHD human myocardium suggesting decreased antioxidant capacity. Treatment with 19,20‐EDP also markedly improved mitochondrial respiration in permeabilized human fibers obtained from IHD hearts. Importantly, the cardioprotective effects of 19,20‐EDP was abolished by the SIRT3 inhibitor nicotinamide. Conclusion We demonstrate that 19,20‐EDP‐mediated cardioprotective mechanisms against IR injury involve preservation of mitochondrial SIRT3 activity, which results in improved cardiac efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology→French-language works237,207→