MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effects of In Vivo Administration of an Endothelial KCa Channel Activator on Recovery of Cardiac Function Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Mice

2020· article· en· W3017147046 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tae yeob Kim, Darrell D. Belke, Ramesh C. Mishra, Andrew P. Braun

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineDiastoleSystoleCardiac function curveInfarctionLigationIschemiaBlood flowArteryVasodilationHeart failureBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cessation of coronary blood flow, due to stenosis or acute blockage, produces prolonged ischemia that results in myocardial infarction (MI) and impaired cardiac function and blood pumping activity of heart. Increasing coronary blood flow to the ischemic area and/or reducing myocardial work are predicted to mitigate the damage typically associated with an acute MI injury. Recent studies from our group have demonstrated that pharmacological enhancement of endothelial KCa2.3 and KCa3.1 channels by the activator SKA‐31 improves agonist‐evoked vasodilation in small resistance arteries from multiple vascular beds and species. The goal of our present study is to investigate the potential cardio‐protective effects of SKA‐31 administration in male mice (12–15 weeks of age, C57B1/6 strain) following an acute myocardial infarct (MI) induced by permanent surgical ligation of the left‐anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Within 48 h post‐surgery, MI and sham surgery mice were treated orally with either vehicle or 10 mg/kg of SKA‐31 for 6–7 weeks. Myocardial damage in MI mice was confirmed by histological staining. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structure and function 2 weeks post‐surgery revealed that left ventricular (LV) wall thickness during systole and diastole was similar in sham animals treated with either vehicle or SKA‐31. In contrast, LV wall thickness during systole and diastole was ~30% greater in MI surgery mice receiving SKA‐31 treatment. At 4 weeks post‐surgery, sham animals exhibited LV wall thickness values during systole (1.00 mm ± 0.03, n=3) and diastole (0.82 mm ± 0.10, n=3) that were similar to those observed at 2 weeks, indicating that SKA‐31 treatment did not adversely affect these parameters. In MI surgery animals receiving SKA‐31 administration for 4 weeks, LV wall thickness during systole (0.97 mm ± 0.10, n=5) and diastole (0.80 mm ± 0.08, n =5) decreased to the values observed in sham surgery mice. At the end of the SKA‐31 treatment period, cardiac output (CO) and LV ejection fraction (EF) measured by pressure‐volume loop analysis were both higher in sham mice (CO = 6.49 mL/min, EF = 50.9%) compared with MI surgery animals (CO = 5.83 mL/min, EF = 40.7%). Following completion of ongoing measurements and analyses, we will present additional data describing changes in cardiac function in MI surgery mice treated with drug vehicle, and histological assessment of myocardial integrity in sham and MI surgery mice. Our preliminary findings thus far suggest that enhancement of endothelial KCa channel activity by SKA‐31 administration improves recovery of cardiac function following ischemic damage associated with blockade of the LAD coronary artery. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by research funding to APB from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 142467) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN‐2017‐04116).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→