MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017177132 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ab895a

Evaluation of an x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry system in the measurement of deformed dose

2020· article· en· W3017177132 on OpenAlexafffund
Evan Maynard, Emily Heath, Michelle Hilts, Andrew Jirasek

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaCarleton UniversityUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDosimetryVoxelMaterials scienceCompression (physics)Nuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringTracking (education)Position (finance)Computer scienceComposite materialArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study is an evaluation of the use of a N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM)-based x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry (PGD) system in the measurement of deformed dose. This work also compares dose that is measured by the gel dosimetry system to dose calculated by a novel deformable dose accumulation algorithm, defDOSXYZnrc, that uses direct voxel tracking. Deformable gels were first irradiated using a single 3.5 × 5 cm 2 open field and the static dose was compared to defDOSXYZnrc as a control measurement. Gel measurement was found to be in excellent agreement with defDOSXYZnrc in the static case with gamma passing rates of 94.5% using a 3%/3 mm criterion and 93.3% using a 3%/2 mm criterion. Following the static measurements, a deformable gel was irradiated with the same single field under an external compression of 25 mm and then released from this compression for dosimetric read out. The measured deformed dose was then compared to deformed dose calculated by defDOSXYZnrc based on deformation vectors produced by the Velocity AI deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm. In the deformed dose distribution there were differences in the measured and calculated field position of up to 0.8 mm and differences in the measured in calculated field size of up to 11.9 mm. Gamma pass rates were 60.0% using a 3%/3 mm criterion and 56.8% using a 3%/2 mm criterion for the deforming measurements representing a decrease in agreement compared to the control measurements. Further analysis showed that passing rates increased to 86.5% using a 3%/3 mm criterion and 70.5% using a 3%/2 mm criterion in voxels within 5 mm of fiducial markers used to guide the deformable image registration. This work represents the first measurement of deformed dose using x-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry. Overall these results highlight some of the challenges in the calculation and measurement of deforming dose and provide insight into possible strategies for improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207