Proposal for the reconstruction of the quarter adjacent to the streets Vardanants, Charents, and Shahinyan of Yerevan city
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. The need for reconstruction of the central quarters of the city of Yerevan is essential due to the incompleteness of the master plan for perimetral development (1924) implementation. It led to numerous dilapidated buildings liable to implementation remained in the courtyards for decades and, over time, were supplemented by new constructions. He process was uncontrolled and caused the formation of a chaotic, uncomfortable, unsafe, and unaesthetic intra-quarter environment that requires urgent urban planning solutions. A similar example is a quarter adjacent to Vardanants, Charents, and Shahinyan streets. This work is devoted to the reconstruction problems of this quarter. The research objective is to summarize the results of the project proposal developed for the reconstruction of the quarter adjacent to Vardanants, Charents, and Shahinyan streets of Yerevan city. Materials and methods. The work was carried out on the base of the general scientific methods of theoretical research, systematization, analysis, synthesis, and generalization of the material. Results. The work consists of the following thematic divisions: the historical process of the development of the territory, research and analysis of the current state of the development, project proposal for the reconstruction. The process of the development of the territory during the XIX–XXIst centuries is summarized. The study of quarter current situation and the analysis carried out on its basis are presented. The problems arisen are identified. The developed proposal for reconstruction is presented. The spatial-planning and functional characteristics of the quarter, progress data indicators, and economic bases for the realization of the project are displayed. Conclusions. The article presents the problems that can be solved with the proposal application, socio-economic, and legal possibilities of the process implementation, the principles of economic calculations, emerging changes in the development indicators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".