MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Influence of Salt Loading on the Kidney Injury Biomarker Neutrophil Gelatinase‐Associated Lipocalin in Healthy Young Adults

2020· article· en· W3017289940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex M. Barnett, Matthew C. Babcock, Joseph C. Watso, Kamila U. Migdal, William B. Farqhuar, Austin T. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal functionCreatinineLipocalinMedicineUrinePlaceboUrinary systemInternal medicineAcute kidney injuryBiomarkerKidneyExcretionEndocrinologyCrossover studyUrologyChemistryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The kidneys play a critical role in blood pressure (BP) regulation. In hypertensive patients and in rodent models, long‐term high dietary sodium (Na+) causes a reduction in kidney function (reduced glomerular filtration rate; GFR). Rodent studies demonstrate that high dietary Na + increases levels of novel kidney injury biomarkers, independent of changes in BP and GFR. However, it is unclear if short‐term high Na + increases kidney injury biomarkers in healthy humans. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that short‐term high Na + intake increases urinary excretion of the novel kidney injury marker Neutrophil Gelatinase‐Associated Lipocalin (NGAL) in healthy, young adults. Methods Twenty participants (12 M/8 F; age: 24±4 years; BMI: 23.1±0.6 kg/m 2 ; BP: 112 ±10/64 ±9 mmHg, mean ± SD) participated in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, crossover study. For 10‐days, participants were asked to consume a 2,300 mg/day Na + diet and supplement with salt (3,900 mg/day of Na + ) or placebo (dextrose) capsules. The conditions were separated by at least two weeks and female participants were tested during the placebo phase of their oral contraceptive cycle. Participants collected their urine for the final 24 hours of each supplementation period to assess urine flow rate, and Na + excretion to verify diet adherence. Brachial BP was measured after at least five minutes of rest. We measured urine and serum creatinine (kinetic modification via the Jaffe reaction) to estimate GFR via creatinine clearance. We used enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays (Toronto Bioscience) to measure urinary NGAL. Statistical analysis included paired t‐tests and Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed rank tests. Results Compared to placebo, Na + supplementation increased urinary Na + excretion (139.9±68.4 vs. 282.5±69.8 mmol/24 hours, p<0.01) but there was no difference in mean arterial BP (77±7 vs. 77±6 mmHg, p=0.64). Serum creatinine concentrations (0.78±0.12 vs. 0.77±0.09 mg/dL, p=0.55) were not different between conditions. However, compared to placebo, Na + supplementation increased creatinine clearance (110.5±32.9 vs. 145.0±24.9 mL/min, p<0.01) and increased urinary NGAL excretion indexed to urine flow rate (16.9±21.9 vs. 28.4±36.1 ng/min, p=0.02). Discussion Our preliminary data suggests that salt loading does not alter serum creatinine concentration but increases creatinine clearance and urinary excretion of the kidney injury marker NGAL in healthy young adults. Support or Funding Information Funding Supported by NIH grants R01HL128388 and K01HL147998, and ACSM Foundation Doctoral Student Research Grant 17‐00521

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207