MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017297805 · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezaa107

Postoperative but not intraoperative transfusions are associated with respiratory failure after pneumonectomy

2020· article· en· W3017297805 on OpenAlexaff
Biniam Kidane, Nithin Jacob, Allan Bruinooge, Yu Shen, Shaf Keshavjee, Marc de Perrot, Andrew F. Pierre, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Marcelo Cypel, Thomas K. Waddell, Gail Darling

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeRespiratory failurePneumonectomyOdds ratioConfidence intervalRespiratory systemBlood transfusionSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyAnesthesiaInternal medicineLung cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Transfusion of blood products has been associated with increased risk of post-pneumonectomy respiratory failure. It is unclear whether intraoperative or postoperative transfusions confer a higher risk of respiratory failure. Our objective was to assess the role of transfusions in developing post-pneumonectomy respiratory failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data on consecutive pneumonectomies between 2005 and 2015. Patient records were reviewed for intraoperative/postoperative exposures. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 251 pneumonectomies performed during the study period, 24 (9.6%) patients suffered respiratory failure. Ninety-day mortality was 5.6% (n = 14) and was more likely in patients with respiratory failure (7/24 vs 7/227, P < 0.001). Intraoperative and postoperative transfusions occurred in 42.2% (n = 106) and 44.6% (n = 112) of patients, respectively and were predominantly red blood cells. On univariable analysis, both intraoperative (P = 0.03) and postoperative transfusion (P = 0.004) were associated with a higher risk of respiratory failure. The multivariable model significantly predicted respiratory failure with an area under curve (AUC) = 0.88 (P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the only independent predictors of respiratory failure were postoperative transfusions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 6.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-24.59; P = 0.005] and lower preoperative forced expiratory volume (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; P = 0.03). Estimated blood loss was not significantly different (P = 0.91) between those with (median 800 ml, interquartile range 300-2000 ml) and without respiratory failure (median 800 ml, interquartile range 300-2000 ml). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory failure occurred in 9.6% of patients post-pneumonectomy and confers a higher risk of 90-day mortality. Postoperative (but not intraoperative) transfusion was the strongest independent predictor associated with respiratory failure. Intraoperative transfusion may be in reaction to active/unpredictable blood loss and may not be easily modifiable. However, postoperative transfusion may be modifiable and potentially avoidable. Transfusion thresholds should be assessed in light of potential cost-benefit trade-offs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicBlood transfusion and managementFrench-language works237,207