MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017316610 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v10n7p53

Assessing the impact of nursing training on patient safety in neonatal intensive care unit at maternity and children's hospital in the K.S.A.

2020· article· en· W3017316610 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nashi Masnad Alreshidi, Michelle Garcia, Rana Mohammad Al Aseeri, Talal Majed Al Reshedi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleNursingAttendanceMedicineNeonatal intensive care unitNursing staffIntervention (counseling)Cluster samplingBachelorScale (ratio)TeamworkNeonatal resuscitationSimple random samplePsychologyEmergency medicinePediatricsPopulationResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: Nursing training programs with thorough planning and implementation, staff knowledge, skills and attitude is enhanced thereby contributing to an improved performance, teamwork and commitment towards achieving organizational goals and objectives. This is a descriptive report of a previously conducted intervention at the hospital. This study seeks to understand the level of staff perception, on the effectiveness of the training/courses implemented or conducted and its impact on staff performance, morale and attitude.Methods: The sample of this study was collected by cluster sampling method which includes 88 NICU staff nurse in Maternity and Children's Hospital of 38 bed capacity. This is a descriptive report of a previously conducted intervention at the hospital. A 5-point likert scale was self-report evaluation tool to assess training effectiveness of the implemented courses and or training and mean score is computed and interpreted. Contents of the questionnaire from the federal authority for government human resources is subjected for content validation.Results: A total of 88 NICU staff nurses, ages ranged between 26-31, majority hold the bachelor degree 77 (87.5%), with an average clinical experience between 1-4 years. According to the 15 enlisted courses/trainings implemented in NICU, the highest rate of attendance is Neonatal Resuscitation Program 60 (68.2%) next is S.T.A.B.L.E. Program 74 (84.1%) and third N.I.D.C.A.P. 48 (54.5%). And base on the self-reported evaluation on the level of agreement of the 6 item question scored by 5-point likert scale the result has a mean score of 4 = agree. Majority of the respondents, 71 (80.9%) had the chance to make use of the skills learnt while 17 (19%) had no chance due to feeling busy most of the time 8 (10%).Conclusions and implication: It is concluded that to ensure patient safety, proper education and correct implementation of training and evaluation results into a positive outcome. A positive outcome on job performance, staff morale and teamwork toward the achievement of organizational goals and objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207