MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Alterations to Mucus Production and Secretion during <i>Giardia</i> Infection Involve <i>Giardia</i> Protease Activity and PAR2 Activation

2020· article· en· W3017323517 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elena Fekete, Christina Amat, Thibault Allain, Koichiro Mihara, Morley D. Hollenberg, Kris Chadee, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucinBiologyProteasesMucusChinese hamster ovary cellGiardiaCysteine proteaseProtease-activated receptor 2MicrobiologyProteaseMolecular biologyReceptorBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The protozoan parasite Giardia duodenalis has been shown to disrupt the intestinal mucus barrier via unknown mechanisms, potentially disrupting host mucosal immunity and contributing to development of post‐infectious disorders. Protease‐activated receptor 2 (PAR2) has been identified as a potential target for secreted Giardia cysteine proteases, and may play a role in disruption of mucus production and secretion in the intestines. Methods The human colonic epithelial cell line LS174T was infected with Giardia trophozoites (isolates NF , WB , S2 , and GSM ). Prior to infection, trophozoites were treated with E64, a broad‐spectrum cysteine protease inhibitor, and LS174T were treated with a pepducin PAR2 antagonist, BAPTA, a calcium chelator, or U0126, an ERK1/2 inhibitor. MUC2 mucin gene expression was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR), and intracellular mucin content was quantified by staining with fluorescein‐coupled wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and imaging using confocal microscopy. Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with nano‐luciferase tagged PAR2 were incubated with Giardia trophozoites. Release of enzymes due to cleavage at the receptor N‐terminus by Giardia resulted in a luminescent signal proportional to the number of cleaved receptors. Wild type (WT) and PAR2 deficient (PAR2 −/−) mice were infected with Giardia trophozoites. The colonic mucus layer was stained using WGA and qPCR was performed for Muc2 and Muc5ac in the small and large intestines. Results Giardia NF , S2 , and WB , but not GSM , upregulate MUC2 expression in LS174T cells. This increase was attenuated by inhibition of Giardia cysteine proteases and by antagonism of PAR2 or inhibition of calcium release or ERK1/2 signaling in LS174T cells. Preliminary results suggest that WGA staining is decreased upon exposure of LS174T to Giardia NF trophozoites. Giardia trophozoites cleaved PAR2 at the N‐terminus, suggesting they are capable of activating the receptor. The amount of cleavage was isolate‐dependent, reflecting differences in protease activity, and cleavage was significantly reduced by E64 treatment for all isolates. Giardia infected WT mice show increased Muc2 and Muc5ac expression in the colon, and increased Muc5ac but decreased Muc2 expression in the jejunum. These changes were not seen in PAR2−/− mice. Both WT infected and PAR2−/− non‐infected mice showed thinning of the colonic mucus layer compared to WT controls. There was some recovery in thickness in PAR2−/− infected mice. Conclusions Giardia ‐induced alterations to mucin gene expression in vitro and in vivo are dependent on PAR2 signaling. Giardia cysteine proteases cleave and activate PAR2, leading to both calcium release and MAPK pathway activation, which in turn contributes to altered gene transcription. Further, Giardia induces altered mucus secretion in vitro, which may contribute to thinning of the colonic mucus gel in vivo. Further study is required to determine the role of PAR2 in mucus secretion during Giardia infection. Support or Funding Information Crohn’s Colitis Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207