MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aldosterone mediates a mineralocorticoid receptor‐mediated increase in prostate cancer cell migration

2020· article· en· W3017385516 on OpenAlexaff
Ross D. Feldman, Qingming Ding, Jozef Chorazyczewski, Robert Gros

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsSt. Boniface HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPAldosteroneDU145Mineralocorticoid receptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineProstate cancerEplerenoneCancer researchMineralocorticoidBiologyCancer cellChemistryMedicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aldosterone is a well‐established regulator of renal and cardiovascular functions. However, its role in regulation of cancer growth and spread has only begun to be appreciated. Studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that aldosterone stimulates renal cancer cell migration in vitro and metastatic spread in vivo (Feldman et. al. FASEB J. 2016 30(6)2086–96). However, the generalizability of these findings to other cancers is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the effect of aldosterone on prostate cancer cell migration and the receptor mechanism involved utilizing three widely‐used prostate cancer cell lines, viz. TRAMP C1, LNCaP and DU 145 cells. RT‐PCR analysis detected robust expression of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in all cell lines. GPER expression was detectable in TRAMP C1 and LNCaP cells but not in DU145 cells. In LNCaP and TRAMPC1 cells, aldosterone mediated a concentration‐dependent increase in migration to a maximum of 141±7% of control at 1000 nM (n=5) in LNCaP cells and 125±3 % at 10 nM (n=6) in TRAMP C1 cells, similar to the maximal extent of stimulation by testosterone [146±9% (n=9) in LNCaP cells and 136±9% (n=3) in TRAMP C1 cells]. The effects of aldosterone were inhibited by the MR antagonist eplerenone, but NOT by the GPER antagonist G15. In contrast, the GPER agonist, G1, INHIBITED migration in both cell lines‐effects that were blocked by G15. In DU 145, cells neither testosterone nor aldosterone stimulated migration. In TRAMP C1 cells, infection with an adeno shMR vector blocked aldosterone‐mediated stimulation of proliferation/migration without effects on G1‐mediated inhibition, whereas infection with an adeno shGPER vector selectively blocked G1‐mediated inhibition of proliferation and migration, without effects on aldosterone’s actions. These findings suggest that in TRAMP C1 and LNCaP cells aldosterone stimulates migration via an MR‐dependent pathway. In DU145 cells, resistance to the effect of aldosterone paralleled resistance to the effect of testosterone. These data support the hypothesis that inhibiting aldosterone secretion/effects may be a novel adjunctive therapeutic approach‐‐at least in some forms of prostate cancer. Support or Funding Information Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canadaand Molson Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207