Obstetric outcomes of twin pregnancies presenting with a complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent normal fetus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data on obstetric and oncologic complications in twin pregnancies combining a complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) coexisting with a normal fetus and placenta are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate perinatal and obstetric outcomes for mother and fetus and risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) in twin pregnancies including a CHM. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE and the grey literature were searched for articles published between May 1980 and May 2019 using a protocol designed a priori and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018112524). SELECTION CRITERIA: Observational cohort studies of four or more cases confirmed by histopathology and providing data on pregnancy outcomes and GTN. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and a meta-analysis was performed. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 344 abstracts identified, 14 studies (244 cases) met the eligibility criteria. The incidence of maternal complication in ongoing pregnancies was 80.8% and included vaginal bleeding, hyperthyroidism and pre-eclampsia. There were overall 91 (50%) live births in ongoing pregnancies and 83 (34%) of the total cases were subsequently diagnosed with GTN. Substantial and significant (P < 0.001) heterogeneity was found for the incidence of preeclampsia indicating variability in reporting the incidence of some obstetric complications between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with a twin pregnancy combining a CHM and an apparently normal fetus have a high risk of perinatal complications, low live-birth rates and around a third of them will develop a GTN and should be managed by specialised multidisciplinary teams. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Our study indicates a high rate of obstetric and oncologic complications in patients presenting with a complete hydatidiform mole and coexistent normal fetus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.016 | 0.033 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".