Stabilizing Training of Generative Adversarial Nets via Langevin Stein Variational Gradient Descent
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generative adversarial networks (GANs), famous for the capability of learning complex underlying data distribution, are however known to be tricky in the training process, which would probably result in mode collapse or performance deterioration. Current approaches of dealing with GANs' issues almost utilize some practical training techniques for the purpose of regularization, which on the other hand undermines the convergence and theoretical soundness of GAN. In this paper, we propose to stabilize GAN training via a novel particle-based variational inference -- Langevin Stein variational gradient descent (LSVGD), which not only inherits the flexibility and efficiency of original SVGD but aims to address its instability issues by incorporating an extra disturbance into the update dynamics. We further demonstrate that by properly adjusting the noise variance, LSVGD simulates a Langevin process whose stationary distribution is exactly the target distribution. We also show that LSVGD dynamics has an implicit regularization which is able to enhance particles' spread-out and diversity. At last we present an efficient way of applying particle-based variational inference on a general GAN training procedure no matter what loss function is adopted. Experimental results on one synthetic dataset and three popular benchmark datasets -- Cifar-10, Tiny-ImageNet and CelebA validate that LSVGD can remarkably improve the performance and stability of various GAN models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it