Intradermal suture effect using polypropylene materials on post-operative scar tissue in cases of lower extremities closed fracture cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertrophic scarring is the most common complication in postoperative wounds. One of the preventive measures for scarring is by adding intradermal sutures when closing the surgical wound. This study aims to prove that the addition of intradermal sutures using polypropylene materials can reduce the complications of scarring in postoperative wounds on lower extremities closed fracture cases under internal fixation procedure.Method: Experimental studies using Randomized Controlled Trial Post Test Only Design were carried out in patients with lower extremity fractures in Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang. The sample was chosen by proportional sampling which was the group given the treatment as well as the control group (n = 36). The variable measured was the clinical appearance of scar tissue formed 6 months after surgery using the Vancouver Scar Scale.Result: The results showed that the addition of intradermal sutures using polypropylene materials had a significant effect on the formation of postoperative scar tissue. The total Vancouver Scar Scale score has a value of p = 0.000 (α = 5%) for Mann Whitney test.Conclusion: The conclusion of this study is that the addition of intradermal sutures using polypropylene threads in cases of closed fractures with internal fixation can reduce the appearance of postoperative scar tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".