MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018097584 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7915

Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Dusty Star-forming Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei in the Equatorial Survey

2020· article· en· W3018097584 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsD-Wave Systems (Canada)University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive galactic nucleusGalaxyFlux (metallurgy)CosmologyBlack-body radiationSpectral lineQuasarTelescopeMilky Way

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a catalog of 510 radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs, primarily blazars) and 287 dusty star-forming galaxies (DSFGs) detected by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope at significance in frequency bands centered on 148 GHz (2 mm), 218 GHz (1.4 mm), and 277 GHz (1.1 mm), from a 480 deg 2 strip centered at R.A. 00 h on the celestial equator with additional 360 deg 2 shallower auxiliary fields at other longitudes. The combination of the deepest available 218 GHz wide-field imaging, our 277 GHz data, and multiband filtering results in the most sensitive wide-field millimeter-wave DSFG selection to date, with rms noise level referenced to 218 GHz reaching below 2 mJy. We have developed new techniques to remove Galactic contamination (including evidence for CO (2−1) line emission) from the extragalactic catalog, yielding a catalog of 321 Galactic sources in addition to the extragalactic catalog. We employ a new flux debiasing method that accounts for the heterogeneous sample selection in the presence of Galactic cuts. We present the spectral properties and source counts of the AGNs and DSFGs. The DSFG spectra depart from the Rayleigh–Jeans regime of an optically thin modified blackbody between 218 and 277 GHz, consistent with optically thick emission or an additional cold dust component. For AGNs with 148 and 218 GHz flux density >50 mJy, we estimate the interyear rms fractional deviation in flux density due to source variability to be 40% with a 0.98 interband correlation coefficient. We provide source counts for AGNs in the range of 8–2870 mJy and for DSFGs in the range of 8–90 mJy. Our DSFG counts probe both the brighter, lensed population and the fainter, unlensed population. At 277 GHz we report the first measurements of source counts at these flux densities, finding an excess above most model count predictions. Finally, we present 30 of the brightest DSFGs that were selected for multifrequency study as candidate high- z lensed systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207