MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018100255 · doi:10.1101/2020.04.22.20074336

Deep phenotyping of 34,128 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and a comparison with 81,596 influenza patients in America, Europe and Asia: an international network study

2020· preprint· en· W3018100255 on OpenAlex
Edward Burn, Seng Chan You, Anthony G. Sena, Kristin Kostka, Hamed Abedtash, Maria Tereza Fernandes Abrahão, Amanda Alberga, Heba Alghoul, Osaid Alser, Thamir M. Alshammari, María Aragón, Carlos Areia, Juan M. Banda, Jaehyeong Cho, Aedín C. Culhane, Alexander Davydov, Frank DeFalco, Talita Duarte‐Salles, Scott L. DuVall, Thomas Falconer, Sergio Fernández‐Bertolín, Weihua Gao, Asieh Golozar, Jill Hardin, George Hripcsak, Vojtech Huser, Hokyun Jeon, Yonghua Jing, Chi Young Jung, Benjamin Skov Kaas‐Hansen, Denys Kaduk, Seamus Kent, Yee-Suk Kim, Spyros Kolovos, Jennifer C. E. Lane, Hyejin Lee, Kristine E. Lynch, Rupa Makadia, Michael E. Matheny, Paras Mehta, Daniel R. Morales, Karthik Natarajan, Fredrik Nyberg, Anna Ostropolets, Rae Woong Park, Jimyung Park, Jose Posada, Albert Prats‐Uribe, Gowtham Rao, Christian Reich, Yeunsook Rho, Peter R. Rijnbeek, Lisa M. Schilling, Martijn J. Schuemie, Nigam H. Shah, Azza Shoaibi, Seok Young Song, Marc A. Suchard, Joel N. Swerdel, David Vizcaya, Salvatore Volpe, Haini Wen, Andrew E. Williams, Belay Birlie Yimer, Lin Zhang, Oleg Zhuk, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Patrick Ryan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health
FundersNational Institutes of HealthMedical Research CouncilVersus ArthritisInnovative Medicines InitiativeEuropean CommissionHealth Insurance Review and Assessment ServiceMinistry of Trade, Industry and EnergyNovo NordiskKorea Health Industry Development InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchGeneralitat de CatalunyaBill and Melinda Gates FoundationLister Hill National Center for Biomedical CommunicationsDirecció General de Recerca, Generalitat de CatalunyaEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsInnovationsfondenNovo Nordisk FondenFundación Alfonso Martín EscuderoU.S. National Library of MedicineU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DemographicsFamily medicinePandemicHealth careHealthcare systemDiabetes mellitusDiseaseDemographyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background In this study we phenotyped individuals hospitalised with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in depth, summarising entire medical histories, including medications, as captured in routinely collected data drawn from databases across three continents. We then compared individuals hospitalised with COVID-19 to those previously hospitalised with influenza. Methods We report demographics, previously recorded conditions and medication use of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in the US (Columbia University Irving Medical Center [CUIMC], Premier Healthcare Database [PHD], UCHealth System Health Data Compass Database [UC HDC], and the Department of Veterans Affairs [VA OMOP]), in South Korea (Health Insurance Review & Assessment [HIRA]), and Spain (The Information System for Research in Primary Care [SIDIAP] and HM Hospitales [HM]). These patients were then compared with patients hospitalised with influenza in 2014-19. Results 34,128 (US: 8,362, South Korea: 7,341, Spain: 18,425) individuals hospitalised with COVID-19 were included. Between 4,811 (HM) and 11,643 (CUIMC) unique aggregate characteristics were extracted per patient, with all summarised in an accompanying interactive website (http://evidence.ohdsi.org/Covid19CharacterizationHospitalization/). Patients were majority male in the US (CUIMC: 52%, PHD: 52%, UC HDC: 54%, VA OMOP: 94%,) and Spain (SIDIAP: 54%, HM: 60%), but were predominantly female in South Korea (HIRA: 60%). Age profiles varied across data sources. Prevalence of asthma ranged from 4% to 15%, diabetes from 13% to 43%, and hypertensive disorder from 24% to 70% across data sources. Between 14% and 33% were taking drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system in the 30 days prior to hospitalisation. Compared to 81,596 individuals hospitalised with influenza in 2014-19, patients admitted with COVID-19 were more typically male, younger, and healthier, with fewer comorbidities and lower medication use. Conclusions We provide a detailed characterisation of patients hospitalised with COVID-19. Protecting groups known to be vulnerable to influenza is a useful starting point to minimize the number of hospital admissions needed for COVID-19. However, such strategies will also likely need to be broadened so as to reflect the particular characteristics of individuals hospitalised with COVID-19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it