MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018197557 · doi:10.1094/pdis-03-20-0602-pdn

First Report of <i>Fusarium equiseti</i> as the Causal Agent of Seed Rot of <i>Matthiola longipetala</i> in Serbia

2020· article· en· W3018197557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Žarko Ivanović, Dragana Milošević, Maja Ignjatov, Ana Marjanović‐Jeromela, Maja Karaman, Mila Grahovac

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
KeywordsBiologyBotanyFusarium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matthiola longipetala (Vent) DC, commonly known as “night-scented stock” or “evening stock”, is the most widely cultivated species of the genus Matthiola in the family Brassicaceae. It is a common garden flower, available in a variety of colors, many of which are heavily scented and also used in floristry. An elevated incidence of Fusarium was observed during a routine quality control seed assay of M. longipetala obtained from a private production facility in Đurđevo (South Bačka District) in 2018. Fungal infection was noticed on an average of 30% of the tested seed, followed by a reduction in germination. The infected seed was covered with white to beige mycelium. Prior to isolation, seeds were surface sterilized for 10 min with a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution to reduce contaminants, washed twice in sterile water, and plated on potato dextrose agar (PDA). After 7 days of incubation at 25°C under a 12-h/12-h photoperiod of fluorescent light, 14 Fusarium (JBL4089/1 to 14) isolates were single spored and subcultured on both PDA and carnation leaf agar (CLA). Pathogenicity was performed in vitro using a modified PDA slant method in a test tube (Porter et al. 2015). A piece of mycelium of each isolate grown on PDA for 7 days was placed at the bottom of each tube, and dried M. longipetala seed was carefully placed 2 cm above the inoculum. After 10 days, fungal mycelia of 14 isolates completely covered the seedlings, causing seed rot and seedling decay. The Fusarium was reisolated on PDA and used for further analysis in order to morphologically identify the species. Isolate JBL4089/2 formed abundant, loosely floccose, whitish aerial mycelium with beige pigmentation. After transfer to CLA, the isolate formed macroconidia with a tapered and elongated apical cell and prominent foot-shaped basal cell, which were typically four to five septate, with average dimensions of 21 to 60 × 2.8 to 4.6 µm. The isolate formed chlamydospores, but microconidia were not observed. Based on the morphological characteristics, isolate JBL4089/2 was identified as Fusarium equiseti (Corda) Sacc. according to Leslie and Summerell (2006) and Gerlach and Nirenberg (1982). Identification of isolate JBL4089/2 was confirmed by amplification and sequencing of a portion of the translation elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1α) gene. Total DNA was extracted directly from fungal mycelium with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and PCR amplification was performed with primer pair EF-1/EF-2 (O’Donnell et al. 1998). Sequence analysis of the EF-1α gene revealed 100% nucleotide identity of isolate JBL4089/2 (GenBank accession no. MK061538) with the EF-1α sequences of two F. equiseti isolates from Canada (KU587617 from Pisum sativum and MH315936 from Glycine max) and a Hyssopus officinalis isolate (MK061540) of F. equiseti from Serbia. To our knowledge, this is the first report of F. equiseti as a causal agent of seed rot on M. longipetala in Serbia. The presence of the pathogen could cause significant economic losses in M. longipetala production, and for that reason control strategies for the management of the disease should be implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207