MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018324814 · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15042

Swarming motility growth favours the emergence of a subpopulation of <scp> <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> </scp> quorum‐sensing mutants

2020· article· en· W3018324814 on OpenAlexafffund
Sophie Robitaille, Marie‐Christine Groleau, Éric Déziel

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Microbiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSwarming (honey bee)Swarming motilityBiologyQuorum sensingMutantFlagellumMotilityPseudomonas aeruginosaPhenotypeBiofilmPopulationGeneticsGeneMicrobiologyCell biologyExperimental evolutionBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Pseudomonas aeruginosa exploits several types of motility behaviours to colonize diverse environments. One of these is swarming motility, a coordinated group movement on a semi‐solid surface. This bacterium needs to express a functional flagellum and produce rhamnolipids to display this type of social motility. A Δ hptB mutant, a gene part of the Gac/Rsm signalling pathway, produces rhamnolipids and expresses a functional flagellum but has an important swarming defect. Experimental‐directed evolution was performed on this mutant under swarming conditions to obtain compensatory mutations and thus identify genes responsible for its deficient swarming phenotype. Unexpectedly, a gain‐of‐function subpopulation emerged from this evolution with mutations in lasR , which codes for a key quorum‐sensing transcriptional regulator. Furthermore, we found that lasR − mutants even emerge at high frequencies in the wild‐type strain when using the same experimental evolution strategy. The resulting evolved population, largely composed of LasR‐defective mutants, is fitter than the original strain in swarming motility. We also established that lasR − mutants have a growth advantage under swarming conditions when compared with wild‐type. Our results demonstrate that a social phenotype, that is, swarming motility, favours the emergence of mutants deficient in a quorum‐sensing regulatory pathway to the benefit of the whole population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental MicrobiologySame topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingFrench-language works237,207