ANALISIS NILAI KAPASITAS STRUKTUR ATAS JEMBATAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RATING FACTOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAKJembatan merupakan infrastruktur transportasi yang vital. Jika suatu jembatan mengalami kegagalan maka lumpuhlah sistem tersebut. Oleh karena itu, kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui nilai kapasitas sisa jembatan eksisting sehingga dapat dinilai bahwa jembatan tersebut masih layak digunakan atau tidak. Kajian ini dilakukan pada segmen P1-P5 (arah Dawuan) jembatan Cinapel yang terletak di Kabupaten Sumedang. Jembatan ini merupakan jembatan beton prategang. Metode kajian yang digunakan adalah metode load rating factor. Dilakukan dengan menghitung kapasitas dukung gelagar dan plat lantai kendaraan. Standar perhitungan dengan mengacu pada Peraturan Penentuan Bridge Load Rating untuk Jembatan Eksisting dari Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (03/SE/M/2016). Dari hasil perhitungan didapatkan hasil bahwa nilai RF gelagar bentang tepi, bentang tengah, dan plat lantai kendaraan memiliki nilai >1 yang artinya bahwa struktur jembatan Cinapel bentang P1-P5 arah Dawuan aman dalam melayani lalu lintas yang melintasi jembatan.Kata kunci: jembatan beton prategang, load rating factor, struktur atasABSTRACTBridges are vital transportation infrastructure. If a bridge fails then the system is chaos. Therefore, this study aims to determine the remaining capacity of the existing bridge where the bridge is still suitable for use or not. This research was conducted on the P1-P5 segment (Dawuan direction) Cinapel bridge located in Sumedang Regency. This bridge is a prestressed concrete bridge. The research method used is the load rating factor method. It was carried out by calculating the carrying capacity of the girder and slab of the bridge. Calculation refer to the Determination for Existing Bridges using Load Rating Factor of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing (03/SE/M/2016). The results of calculation obtained that the RF of the outer span girder, middle span, and slab are greater than 1 (RF > 1) which means that the structure of the Cinapel bridge span P1-P5 is safe.Keywords: prestressed concrete bridge, load rating factor, upper structure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".