MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018469617 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01063

Excited-State Vibronic Dynamics of Bacteriorhodopsin from Two-Dimensional Electronic Photon Echo Spectroscopy and Multiconfigurational Quantum Chemistry

2020· article· en· W3018469617 on OpenAlexafffund
Samer Gozem, Philip J. M. Johnson, Alexei Halpin, Hoi Ling Luk, Takefumi Morizumi, Valentyn I. Prokhorenko, Oliver P. Ernst, Massimo Olivucci, R. J. Dwayne Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMax-Planck-GesellschaftMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaDivision of ChemistryUniversity of TorontoCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaHuman Frontier Science Program
KeywordsBacteriorhodopsinExcited stateSpectroscopyQuantum chemistryChemistryVibronic spectroscopyEcho (communications protocol)Dynamics (music)Atomic physicsPhotonTwo-photon excitation microscopyPhotochemistryPhysicsMolecular physicsQuantum mechanicsPhysical chemistryFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owing to the ultrafast time scale of the photoinduced reaction and high degree of spectral overlap among the reactant, product, and excited electronic states in bacteriorhodopsin (bR), it has been a challenge for traditional spectroscopies to resolve the interplay between vibrational dynamics and electronic processes occurring in the retinal chromophore of bR. Here, we employ ultrafast two-dimensional electronic photon echo spectroscopy to follow the early excited-state dynamics of bR preceding the isomerization. We detect an early periodic photoinduced absorptive signal that, employing a hybrid multiconfigurational quantum/molecular mechanical model of bR, we attribute to periodic mixing of the first and second electronic excited states (S1 and S2, respectively). This recurrent interaction between S1 and S2, induced by a bond length alternation of the retinal chromohore, supports the hypothesis that the ultrafast photoisomerization in bR is initiated by a process involving coupled nuclear and electronic motion on three different electronic states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207