MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018480425 · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15853-1

Dynamic electrocatalyst with current-driven oxyhydroxide shell for rechargeable zinc-air battery

2020· article· en· W3018480425 on OpenAlexafffund
Ya‐Ping Deng, Yi Jiang, Ruilin Liang, Shaojian Zhang, Dan Luo, Yongfeng Hu, Xin Wang, Jun‐Tao Li, Aiping Yu, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of Waterloo
FundersWaterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of WaterlooNational Research Council CanadaWestern Economic Diversification CanadaGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of WaterlooNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source
KeywordsElectrocatalystBattery (electricity)BimetalBifunctionalOxygen evolutionZincMaterials scienceNitrideElectrodeNanotechnologyChemistryElectrochemistryPower (physics)MetallurgyCatalysisPhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent fruitful studies on rechargeable zinc-air battery have led to emergence of various bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts, especially metal-based materials. However, their electrocatalytic configuration and evolution pathway during battery operation are rarely spotlighted. Herein, to depict the underlying behaviors, a concept named dynamic electrocatalyst is proposed. By selecting a bimetal nitride as representation, a current-driven “shell-bulk” configuration is visualized via time-resolved X-ray and electron spectroscopy analyses. A dynamic picture sketching the generation and maturation of nanoscale oxyhydroxide shell is presented, and periodic valence swings of performance-dominant element are observed. Upon maturation, zinc-air battery experiences a near two-fold enlargement in power density to 234 mW cm −2 , a gradual narrowing of voltage gap to 0.85 V at 30 mA cm −2 , followed by stable cycling for hundreds of hours. The revealed configuration can serve as the basis to construct future blueprints for metal-based electrocatalysts, and push zinc-air battery toward practical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations259
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207