MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3018488310 · doi:10.1117/12.2557900

Deep learning-based crack detection in a concrete tunnel structure using multispectral dynamic imaging

2020· article· en· W3018488310 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rahmat Ali, Jiangyu Zeng, Young‐Jin Cha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftmax functionPixelComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkRobustness (evolution)ComputationDeep learningComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new computer vision-based method is proposed for concrete crack detection in tunnel structures using multi-spectral dynamic imaging (MSX). The MSX images were collected from a tunnel in the University of Manitoba, Canada. A total of 3600 MSX images (299 × 299 pixels) were used to train the modified deep inception neural network (DINN), and an additional 300 MSX images (299 × 299 pixels) were employed for validation purposes. The MSX images were examined by the trained neural network for concrete crack detection. The main purpose of this research was to examine the potential of the neural network to distinguish between noise and concrete surface cracks in the MSX images. A fully connected layer and a softmax layer were added to the DINN network in the transfer learning section to reduce the network computation cost. The proposed network used green bounding boxes to detect the portions with cracks in the MSX images. A training accuracy of 95.5% and a validation accuracy of 94% were achieved at 1600 iterations. The optimum training steps obtained from the training and validation were used for testing purposes. The robustness of the trained network was evaluated using an additional 96 MSX images (640 × 480 pixels). A maximum testing accuracy of 94% was recorded when the prediction probability was limited to 90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207