Preclinical safety and efficacy of 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or lactosylceramide treatment to enhance fracture repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyp24a1-null mice deficient in 24,25(OH)2D3 display impaired callus formation during the endochondral phase of bone fracture repair. The 24,25(OH)2D3 metabolite acted by binding to the TLC domain containing 3B isoform 2 (TLCD3B2, previously named FAM57B2) effector protein, which then synthesizes lactosylceramide (LacCer). Treatment with 24,25(OH)2D3 or LacCer restored callus size and mechanical properties in Cyp24a1-null mice. To assess the safety of these molecules and test their efficacy for bone healing in wild-type, non-genetically modified mice, we treated 12-week-old, osteotomized C57BL/6 female mice with each compound for up to 21 days post-osteotomy. Control cohorts were injected with vehicle. Neither compound was found to exhibit any nephro- nor hepato-toxicity. Calcemia remained stable throughout the experiment and was unaffected by either treatment. Supplementation with 24,25(OH)2D3 increased circulating levels of this metabolite about 8-fold, decreased 1,25(OH)2D3 levels, and significantly increased circulating 1,24,25(OH)3D3 levels, suggesting 1?-hydroxylation of 24,25(OH)2D3. TLCD3B2 was found to be expressed in fracture callus at the surface of unmineralized or pre-mineralized cartilage on day 10 and day 12 post-osteotomy and to progressively recede to become undetectable by day 18. Treatment with 24,25(OH)2D3 or LacCer reduced the number of TLCD3B2-positive cells. Both treatments also significantly increased stiffness and elastic modulus of the healing bone callus. Exogenous administration of 24,25(OH)2D3 or LacCer improved the biomechanical properties of repaired bones in wild-type animals without affecting circulating calcium levels or other blood parameters, demonstrating preclinical safety and efficacy. Our data suggest the use of 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or lactosylceramide for ameliorating fracture healing in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".