Operations & Maintenance Optimization of Wind Turbines Integrating Wind and Aging Information
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Operations & maintenance (O&M) of wind turbines (both onshore and offshore) are heavily affected by weather conditions, particularly wind conditions. Current O&M models focused mainly on negative impacts of wind conditions on turbine reliability and maintenance, while ignoring potential maintenance opportunities emerging from dynamic wind velocities. This article addresses this issue by constructing a novel weather-centered O&M framework, integrating wind impacts on: (a) energy production, and (b) maintenance plans. Both the positive (maintenance opportunities) and negative impacts (maintenance delays) of wind conditions are quantified in the framework. Accordingly, a weather-centered opportunistic maintenance policy is developed to enable a flexible maintenance resource allocation. The maintenance model is formulated, and analytical properties regarding optimal maintenance ages are discussed. Furthermore, the net revenue of wind turbines is evaluated using the performance-based contracting (PBC), which captures dynamics of both power generation and operational costs. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of our framework in revenue improvement, particularly when facing high failure risks and production losses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it