MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019119868 · doi:10.34194/geusb.v10.4866

Colophon, Contents, Review of Survey activities

2006· article· en· W3019119868 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam A. Garde

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland Bulletin · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudience measurementGeological surveySurvey researchGeographyLibrary scienceGeologyPolitical scienceComputer sciencePsychologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review of Survey activities 2005 Adam A. GardeChief editor The present volume is the third issue of Review of Survey activities (RoSa). It contains 15 four-page contributions that cover a wide range of the current activities at the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). Thirteen of these are short scientific papers dealing with ongoing research by the Survey and its external partners. For the first time the research-based papers in the Review are now externally peer reviewed. A new standing panel of reviewers for RoSa has been established to ensure that the contributions are of general interest to a wide readership and that, within the limitations of space, they maintain the normal scientific standards of the Survey's publications. All articles are planned to be easily readable by non-specialists, and since this is a Review of Survey activities, it should be borne in mind that many papers are first accounts of ongoing research. The fact that almost all contributions in the current volume are scientific in nature implies that while providing a timely panorama of current research at the Survey, they are far from embracing all projects undertaken by the Survey in Denmark, Greenland and other countries in 2005. A factual overview of the activities of GEUS as a whole can be obtained at GEUS' website. In the present volume three papers deal with Cretaceous–Holocene onshore and offshore stratigraphy, sedimentology and palaeoceanography in Denmark, in part related to hydrocarbon exploration. A fourth paper from Denmark, that illustrates just one of the broad spectrum of the Survey's routine responsibilities undertaken on behalf of the state, addresses construction of 3D geological models to characterise the migration of point-source pollution in groundwater reservoirs. Projects related to Greenland and the Arctic in general are represented in this volume by a group of ten papers. The first is a methodology paper describing advanced in situ geochronological and trace element microanalysis by laser ablation techniques, a now routine analytical tool at the Survey that has provided data for several of the subsequent articles, including a study of sediment provenance in the East Greenland – Faroe Islands – Shetland region, and an account of zircon geochronology applied to Archaean geological studies in southern West Greenland. Within the same region, a new method of integrative and quantitative assessment of the gold potential is presented, and two papers deal with newly discovered kimberlites and carbonatites and their potential economic significance. One paper describes five profiles through basalts and sedimentary rocks in the Nuussuaq Basin in West Greenland, constructed using geological photogrammetrical techniques along coastal cliffs and steep valley sides. Another paper presents new evidence for the presence of continental crust in the Davis Strait obtained from seabed sampling; this is an important new contribution to the long-standing debate of the nature of the crust under the Labrador Sea and Davis Strait and its stratigraphy. A report on ongoing studies of the deep crustal structure of Greenland using earthquake seismology is presented, and a last paper concerning the Arctic region describes radical former climatic changes in the Arctic Ocean and the geophysical signature of the Lomonosov Ridge north of Greenland, and discusses the sensitivity of the sea-ice cover to global warming. The final paper in the present volume describes the development of an environmental sensitivity atlas for coastal areas of Kenya. This project is just one of several current GEUS projects where the Survey's broad technical and managing expertise is put to use in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207