Preparation of Amine‐ and Disulfide‐Containing PAMAM‐Based Dendrons for the Functionalization of Hydroxylated Surfaces: XPS as Structural Sensor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Herein, we report the synthesis of novel poly(amido amine) [PAMAM]‐based dendrons with external amine and disulfide functional groups and an alkoxysilane moiety as the focal point. Four generations ( G1 ‐ G4 ) of dendrons were obtained by combining Michael addition and amidation reactions using (3‐aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane as the starting core; disulfide bridges and amine groups were introduced in the last step by ester amidation with cystamine and ethylendiamine. The resulting dendrons were characterized by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), Raman, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Z‐potential techniques. The growth of the dendrons was monitored by analysing the X‐ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) high resolution spectra of the Si 2p, N 1s, C 1s, O 1s and S 2p signals for each dendron generation. The results evidence that it is possible to record, with good confidence, the compositional and structural changes that occur during the preparative route by means of XPS technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".