MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3019150006 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038271

The RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE): Parameterisation of RAVE spectra based on convolutional neural networks

2020· article· en· W3019150006 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Guiglion, G. Matijevič, A. B. A. Queiroz, M. Valentini, Matthias Steinmetz, C. Chiappini, E. K. Grebel, P. J. McMillan, G. Kordopatis, Andrea Kunder, T. Zwitter, A. Khalatyan, F. Anders, H. Enke, Ivan Minchev, G. Monari, Rosemary F. Ġ. Wyse, O. Bienaymé, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, B. K. Gibson, Julio F. Navarro, Q. A. Parker, W. Reid, G. M. Seabroke, A. Siebert

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAustralian Astronomical Optics-MacquarieAustralian Research CouncilInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of California, Los AngelesW. M. Keck FoundationMacquarie UniversityCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSLeibniz-GemeinschaftLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamJet Propulsion LaboratoryCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAustralian National UniversityNational Science FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityEuropean Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhotometry (optics)Spectral linePhysicsAstrophysicsAstrometryStarsContext (archaeology)Convolutional neural networkEffective temperatureAstronomyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Data-driven methods play an increasingly important role in the field of astrophysics. In the context of large spectroscopic surveys of stars, data-driven methods are key in deducing physical parameters for millions of spectra in a short time. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) enable us to connect observables (e.g. spectra, stellar magnitudes) to physical properties (atmospheric parameters, chemical abundances, or labels in general). Aims. We test whether it is possible to transfer the labels derived from a high-resolution stellar survey to intermediate-resolution spectra of another survey by using a CNN. Methods. We trained a CNN, adopting stellar atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances from APOGEE DR16 (resolution R = 22 500) data as training set labels. As input, we used parts of the intermediate-resolution RAVE DR6 spectra ( R ∼ 7500) overlapping with the APOGEE DR16 data as well as broad-band ALL_WISE and 2MASS photometry, together with Gaia DR2 photometry and parallaxes. Results. We derived precise atmospheric parameters T eff , log( g ), and [M/H], along with the chemical abundances of [Fe/H], [ α /M], [Mg/Fe], [Si/Fe], [Al/Fe], and [Ni/Fe] for 420 165 RAVE spectra. The precision typically amounts to 60 K in T eff , 0.06 in log( g ) and 0.02−0.04 dex for individual chemical abundances. Incorporating photometry and astrometry as additional constraints substantially improves the results in terms of the accuracy and precision of the derived labels, as long as we operate in those parts of the parameter space that are well-covered by the training sample. Scientific validation confirms the robustness of the CNN results. We provide a catalogue of CNN-trained atmospheric parameters and abundances along with their uncertainties for 420 165 stars in the RAVE survey. Conclusions. CNN-based methods provide a powerful way to combine spectroscopic, photometric, and astrometric data without the need to apply any priors in the form of stellar evolutionary models. The developed procedure can extend the scientific output of RAVE spectra beyond DR6 to ongoing and planned surveys such as Gaia RVS, 4MOST, and WEAVE. We call on the community to place a particular collective emphasis and on efforts to create unbiased training samples for such future spectroscopic surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→