Double Robertsonian translocations in an infertile patient with macrocytic anemia: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Constitutional heterologous double Robertsonian translocations (DRT) between chromosomes 13/14 and chromosomes 14/15 with 44 chromosomes are extremely rare. In this case report, we present the karyotype analysis of metaphases prepared from bone marrow, peripheral blood and cultured skin tissue cells. These showed only 44 chromosomes with DRT involving chromosomes 13, 14 and 15. To our knowledge this is the first reported case with DRT involving chromosomes 14 and 15. Case presentation The patient is an 81-year-old infertile male with a history of persistent macrocytic anemia (MA). The patient presented with fatigue, paleness of the skin, shortness of breath, lightheadedness and occasional dizziness. Work-up for common causes of macrocytic anemias in this case were excluded: folate/vitamin B12 deficiency, hypothyroidism, liver diseases, hemolysis, bleeding, alcoholism, exposure, HIV infection, chemotherapy or blood loss, drug-toxicity effect, or myelodysplasia. This individual with DRT had only six nucleolus organizer regions (NORs), instead of the usual ten, of which 50% of the 6 NORs were inactive (n = 3). Conclusion In this case, macrocytic anemia (MA) appeared to be due to reduction in active NORs in DRT. We postulate that the marked reduction in active NORs leads to reduction in active nucleoli formation, which may be limiting ribosomal RNA synthesis, contributing to MA. It is probable that reduction in NOR activity affected normal DNA synthesis and cellular functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".