Comparative efficacy of four insecticides and two indigenous plant extracts against wild crucifer aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gold-of-pleasure, leindotter and linseed dodder are the titles used for Camelina sativa L. This crop is under menace of severe infestation of aphid. Aphid population of was noted from arbitrarily five selected camelina plants of every treatment. Two plant oils (Ricinus communis, Jatropha curcus) and four synthetic insecticides (Acetamiprid, Imidachloprid, Cypermethrin and Diafenthiuron) were used. Mortality data of L. erysimi was recorded at regular interval of 24 hs. till 96 hs. of treatments applications. Results of toxicity bioassays displayed that application of Acetamiprid and R. communis resulted in enhanced mortality of L. erysimi than the other treatments, applied. Highest mortality rate (78.67%) of the test insect pest was recorded in Canadian variety of camelina by application of Acetamiprid whilst lowest 36.10% was observed by Diafenthiuron, after exposure period of 96 hs. While highest and lowest mortality rates of the target insect pest in Australian camelina were 70.19% and 29.10%, respectively. Consequently, it is concluded that the application of Acetamiprid can be an effective tool in integrated pest management programme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".