MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019880535 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8b5c

The MUSTANG Galactic Plane Survey (MGPS90) Pilot

2020· article· en· W3019880535 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactic planeTelescopeFlux (metallurgy)Plane (geometry)CalibrationGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the results of a pilot program for a Green Bank Telescope MUSTANG-2 Galactic Plane survey at 3 mm (90 GHz), MGPS90. The survey achieves a typical 1 σ depth of 1–2 mJy beam −1 with a 9″ beam. We describe the survey parameters, quality assessment process, cataloging, and comparison with other data sets. We have identified 709 sources over seven observed fields selecting some of the most prominent millimeter-bright regions between 0 deg < ℓ < 50 deg (total area ≈7.5 deg 2 ). The majority of these sources have counterparts at other wavelengths. By applying flux selection criteria to these sources, we successfully recovered several known hypercompact H ii (HCH ii ) regions but did not confirm any new ones. We identify 126 sources that have mm-wavelength counterparts but do not have cm-wavelength counterparts and are therefore candidate HCH ii regions; of these, 10 are morphologically compact and are strong candidates for new HCH ii regions. Given the limited number of candidates in the extended area in this survey compared to the relatively large numbers seen in protoclusters W51 and W49, it appears that most HCH ii regions exist within dense protoclusters. Comparing the counts of HCH ii to ultracompact H ii (UCH ii ) regions, we infer the HCH ii region lifetime is 16%–46% that of the UCH ii region lifetime. We additionally separated the 3 mm emission into dust and free–free emission by comparing with archival 870 and 20 cm data. In the selected pilot fields, most (≳80%) of the 3 mm emission comes from plasma, either through free–free or synchrotron emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207