MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3020333095 · doi:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.172

Abstract 172: Ultra-Fast Cooling Through Total Liquid Ventilation is Safe and Feasible in Non-Human Primates

2019· article· en· W3020333095 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias Kohlhauer, Emilie Boissady, Fanny Lidouren, Estelle Faucher, Mathieu Nadeau, Bijan Ghaleh, Philippe Micheau, Renaud Tissier

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional residual capacityMedicineExhalationVentilation (architecture)Tidal volumeRespiratory minute volumeRespiratory rateRespiratory systemPositive end-expiratory pressureAnesthesiaLung volumesLungCardiologyNuclear medicineMechanical ventilationInternal medicineHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Total liquid ventilation (TLV) with temperature-controlled perfluorocarbons (PFC) provides ultra-rapid and protective cooling in animal models of cardiac arrest. However, the ideal ventilatory parameters still need to be determined for a perfectly safe translation of the procedure in humans, especially regarding expiratory residual volume (RV) and tidal volume of PFC (TV) during TLV. Hypothesis: We hypothetised that TLV with low RV and TV of PFC is safe and efficient for ultra-fast cooling induction in non-human primates. Method: We enrolled two 13-years monkeys ( Macaca Fascicularis ) weighting 10.6 and 11.7 kg, respectively. Lung functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured by CT-scan and 3D-reconstruction of the lung. Two weeks later, animals were anesthetised and submitted to 20 min of TLV with end-expiratory volume of ≈50% of the FRC and TV = 8 ml/kg. The respiratory rate was set to 8/min and the target temperature was 33°C. After the TLV procedure, animals were weaned by prolonged exhalation followed by 6 hours under conventional mechanical ventilation (PEEP = 5 mmHg) before awakening. Three weeks later, they were ansthestized again for blood gases measurement and CT-scan examination for evaluation of the lung parenchyma integrity. Result: The initial CT-scan revealed a FRC of 26 and 32 ml/kg in the two animals, respectively. RV was then set at 15 ml/kg for TLV in both animals. During TLV, gas exchanges were normal (arterial partial pressure of CO 2 was 34 and 43 mmHg, respectively). Pulse oxymetry also remained above 97% throughout TLV. The target temperature of 33°C was achieved in the entire body within 15 min for both animals. Additionally, lung static compliance was not altered during or after TLV. After animal weaning, no any sign of respiratory discomfort was evidenced despite careful clinical monitoring. After three weeks, CT-scan examination revealed no structural abnormality of the lung parenchym and arterial partial pressure of CO 2 was normal (35 and 46 mmHg). Based on their excellent health status, animals were transferred to a rehabilitation center. Conclusion: Total liquid ventilation below FRC is feasible and safe, without any impairement of the cooling performance in a clinically relevant non-human primate model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→