A Mechanistic Study of the Hydrolysis of Poly[<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylates] as Charge-Shifting Polycations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polycations are used extensively in applications ranging from enhanced oil recovery to biomaterials. Poly[N,N-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate] (PDMAEA) has attracted interest for biomaterial applications because of its rapid hydrolysis; however, the mechanism of hydrolysis and the conditions that affect degradation often appear amiss in the field. In this report, a detailed 1H NMR spectroscopy study of the hydrolysis of PDMAEA was carried out between pH 0 and 14. In contrast to a widely held view, the rates of hydrolysis of this polymer were found to be highly pH-dependent with half-lives varying from years to minutes as a function of pH. The extent of hydrolysis was also found to be pH-dependent, with a distinct plateau at about 50–60% hydrolysis at pH 7 due to the electrostatic repulsion of anionic carboxylate groups and hydroxide. This was contrasted with the acid-catalyzed mechanism where hydrolysis of PDMAEA at pH 0.3 did not show a plateau in the extent of hydrolysis, reaching 88% hydrolysis after 8 days at 70 °C. In addition, the effects of neighboring functional groups on DMAEA hydrolysis in copolymers were explored, with anionic, neutral/hydrophilic, and cationic comonomers found to affect the rates of hydrolysis up to 20-fold at pH 7. Finally, two novel analogues of DMAEA with an additional dimethylamino group in different positions of the side chain were synthesized and polymerized to probe the effect of this added tertiary amine on the hydrolysis of the ester linkages. Poly[1,3-bis (dimethylamino)-2-propyl acrylate] (PBDMAPA) hydrolyzed more than 500 times faster at pH 7 than its linear isomer poly[2-((2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)(methyl)amino)ethyl acrylate] (PDEMEA). These results further highlight the importance of the intramolecular interactions of the dimethylamino substituent of PDMAEA and the effect of proximity and steric hindrance of the amino group as well as neighboring functional groups of comonomers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".