Experimental investigation of a compressed air vehicle prototype with phase change materials for heat recovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, an experimental investigation, where the prototype of a new pneumatic vehicle is developed, analyzed, built and tested, is presented. The system consists of a novel compressed air system integrated with phase change materials for heat recovery purposes. The prototype is experimentally built and tested at the Ontario Tech. University in Oshawa. Three different phase change materials of polyethyleneglycol, paraffin and alkane mix are investigated for heat recovery purposes in the prototype where the paraffin option provides the best result. Furthermore, the maximum torque is found to vary between 21 and 44 Nm with changing shaft speed from 400 to 1300 rpm while the minimum torque fluctuates between 3 and 13 Nm with changing shaft speed in the same range. The supplementary battery power is 2.18 kW, and the turbine work output is found to be 1.25 kW with the recovered air which is provides 36% of the heat required to heat up the PCM heat exchanger. The total motor work consumed during operation is 18.36 kW, which can be defined as the acceptable capacity for the powertrain of a small‐size city vehicle. The energetic efficiency for the compressed air vehicle is 59.5% while the exergetic efficiency becomes 51.0%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it