Nutritional status and living conditions of adults and older people in quilombola communities, municipality of Santarem, Para - Amazon, Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico; POF, pesquisa de orçamentos familiares; INSAN, insegurança alimentar e nutricional.The nutritional status of adults, especially in rural populations, is a complex phenomenon that involves socioeconomic, climatic, environmental, health status, lack of health care and lack of access to specialized services, among others.3 The precarious living conditions are usually expressed in the low income of the family unit, in the limited purchasing power, especially of food, in the precarious conditions of household and environmental sanitation and in the limited and unequal access to health services with resolutive capacity.4,5 Several studies have shown that developing countries, like Brazil, live with the nutritional and epidemiological transition.2,6,7 However, the analysis of studies carried out in quilombola areas in Brazil found, with regard to this transition, quite the opposite, an overlap of these diseases, where chronic non-communicable diseases, coexist with infectious and nutritional conditions, characterized by high prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, overweight, infectious diseases, infant mortality and nutritional disorders that, in addition to the difficulties with regard to the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".