MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020854669 · doi:10.33137/rr.v37i1.8682

The Rhetoric of the Body from Ovid to Shakespeare

2001· article· en· W3020854669 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lynn Enterline, Goran Stanivuković

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricArtLiteraturePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lynn Enterline's book appears at a time when the scholarship on Renaissance Ovid is burgeoning, affecting the ways we think about imitation, constructions of subjectivity, and ideas and fantasies about the body and sexuality in early modern literature.Her lucid book combines historical, psychoanalytic (it is informed by Freud, Lacan, and Kristeva), and feminist approaches to the body with rhetorical, semiotic, and post-structuralist analyses of language (occasionally drawing on Barthes and Derrida, among others).Enterline provides critical, theoretical, and cultural readings of the ways the language of literature shapes different, often clashing, bodies in poetry and drama.The methodological and theoretical parameters of Enterline's approach continue to expand the study of rhetoric, corporeality, Ovidianism, and psychoanalysis, a field that, in a way, Enterline herself has shaped through her previous psychoanalytically informed work on Renaissance Ovidianism, language, and subjectivity.The present book extends further this rich field of critical inquiry and demonstrates, yet again, that perhaps the closest early equivalents to modern ideas of the subconscious and its psychoanalytic interpretations are found in the Renaissance reworkings of the conflicting and turbulent meshing of corporeality and interiority in Ovid's works.Enterline's examination of early texts ranks among the most theoretically sophisticated that apply psychoanalytic theory to early modern literature.The book's contention, Enterline states at the outset, is "that the violated and fractured body is the place where, for Ovid, aesthetics and violence converge, where the usually separated realms of the rhetorical and the sexual most insistently meet" (p. 1).Thus her study of the complex intertwining of the poetic and the erotic primarily focuses on the close analysis of tropes and forms of corporeal violence and dismemberment, as well as their effects on desire, femininity, and masculinity in Italian and English Renaissance literature.In her demonstration of the very productive and systematic use of post-structuralist theories of writing, language, and desire in the analysis of early modern texts, Enterline never subsumes texts into theory.Rather, she grounds her theory in the text and then, through close analyses, unpacks what she does.Enterline's selection of texts ranges from Ovid's Metamorphoses, to Petrarch's Rime Sparse, to John Marston's Metamorphosis of Pigmalions Image, to Shakespeare's The Rape of Lucrece and The Winter's Tale.The book has six chapters, each devoted either to Ovidian figures (for example, Daphne and Medusa) and the problems they embody in literature, or to a literary text and a topic or figures central to that text's preoccupation with the body.The introductory chapter, "Pursuing Daphne," which focuses on violence and agency in the myths of Daphne and Medusa, and explores forms of verbal fetishism and its Renaissance uses with particular attention to Petrarch's Rime Sparse, foregrounds much of the book's argument, especially as developed in the next chapter, "Medusa's mouth: body and voice in the Metamorphoses."Here, in a feminist critique of Metamorphoses,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.017
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207