Model of contact interaction in threaded joint equipped with spring-loaded collet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Loosening of threaded joints, especially those operating under dynamic loading conditions, is a common and traditional problem for machines, mechanisms and structures. This study develops scientific approaches to the frictional lock of bolted joints to prevent unintentional self-unscrewing. An analytical version of the theory of threaded joint, which is equipped with a spring-loaded collet, is developed in the paper. The mixed contact problem of the interaction of the cyclic-symmetric system of the collet nut blades with the inner bolt and the outer spring, which is fitted with tightness, was set up and solved. In order to obtain analytical solutions to the problem, original one-dimensional models of structural elements of the connection were constructed. Based on the solutions of the contact problem, the moment of friction force is calculated from the initial gap between the blades and the thread, from the value of the spring tightness, from the parameters of the rigidity of the blade and the clamping spring. Finally, the value of the maximum friction torque that counteracts the self-unscrewing of the collet nut is evaluated, and some features of the threaded joint with the collet nut design are considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".