MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021138151 · doi:10.3390/rs12091476

Evaluating Simulated RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) Compact Polarimetry for Open-Water and Flooded-Vegetation Wetland Mapping

2020· article· en· W3021138151 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ian Olthof, Thomas Rainville

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsRemote sensingSynthetic aperture radarEnvironmental scienceConstellationFlood mythAncillary dataPolarimetryComputer scienceGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When severe flooding occurs in Canada, the Emergency Geomatics Service (EGS) is tasked with creating and disseminating maps that depict flood extents in near real time. EGS flood mapping methods were created with efficiency and robustness in mind, to allow maps to be published quickly, and therefore have the potential to generate high-repeat water products that can enhance frequent wetland monitoring. The predominant imagery currently used is synthetic aperture radar (SAR) from RADARSAT-2 (R2). With the commissioning phase of the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM) complete, the EGS is adapting its methods for use with this new source of SAR data. The introduction of RCM’s circular-transmit linear-receive (CTLR) beam mode provides the option to exploit compact polarimetric (CP) information not previously available with R2. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective CP parameters for use in mapping open water and flooded vegetation, using current EGS methodologies, and compare these products to those created by using R2 data. Nineteen quad-polarization R2 scenes selected from three regions containing wetlands prone to springtime flooding were used to create reference flood maps, using existing EGS tools. These scenes were then used to simulate 22 RCM CP parameters at different noise floors and spatial resolutions representative of the three RCM beam modes. Using multiple criteria, CP parameters were ranked in order of importance and entered into a stepwise classification procedure, for evaluation against reference R2 products. The top four CP parameters —m-chi-volume or m-delta-volume, RR intensity, Shannon Entropy intensity (SEi), and RV intensity—achieved a maximum agreement with baseline R2 products of upward of 98% across all 19 scenes and three beam modes. Separability analyses between flooded vegetation and other land-cover classes identified four candidate CP parameters—RH intensity, RR intensity, SEi, and the first Stokes parameter (SV0)—suitable for flooded-vegetation-region growing. Flooded-vegetation-region-growing CP thresholds were found to be dependent on incidence angle for each of these four parameters. After region growing using each of the four candidate CP parameters, RH intensity was deemed best to map flooded vegetation, based on our evaluations. The results of the study suggest a set of suitable CP parameters to generate flood maps from RCM data, using current EGS methodologies that must be validated further as real RCM data become available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207