SUN-093 Prospective Clinical Assessment Study in Children with Achondroplasia: The PROPEL Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND: Achondroplasia (ACH) is the most common non-lethal form of skeletal dysplasia, affecting between 1 in 15,000 to 1 in 30,000 live births [Horton et al. 2007; Waller et al. 2008]. Children and adults with ACH have disproportionate short stature, with a final height of approximately 131 cm for males and 124 cm for females. They are prone to significant co-morbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea, chronic otitis media with conductive hearing loss, spinal stenosis and a propensity towards obesity. In some infants, narrowing of the foramen magnum may result in compression of the spinal cord with neurologic sequelae, requiring timely neurosurgical intervention. There are currently no approved therapies for the treatment of ACH in either the United States or the European Union, and management is generally supportive in nature. The PROPEL trial is a prospective, non-interventional study examining baseline growth parameters and health status in children with ACH being assessed for potential enrollment into interventional studies with infigratinib, an oral FGFR1-3 inhibitor in development for achondroplasia. Methods: Children with ACH between the ages of 2.5 and 10 years are eligible for enrollment in this prospective, non-interventional trial to evaluate growth parameters and determine clinical status. Participants will be assessed at baseline, month 3, month 6, and every 6 months thereafter. The primary endpoint is annualized height growth velocity. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in other growth parameters (including body proportionality); analysis of bone biomarkers (e.g., bone alkaline phosphatase, collagen X fragment); and the occurrence of medical events and surgical procedures. Participants will be enrolled in the study for a minimum of 6 months up to a maximum of 2 years before being considered for enrollment in a QED-sponsored phase 2/3 interventional trial. Current status: The PROPEL study is underway with the first patient enrolled in August 2019. Planned total enrollment is 200 children with ACH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".